Minutes 2025

Minutes of July Ordinary Meeting of Sligo County Council held at 10.00 am on Monday 7th July, 2025 in The Council Chamber, County Hall, Riverside, Sligo

COUNCILLORS PRESENT:

Councillor Bree,
Councillor Brennan,
Councillor Casserly,
Councillor Clarke,
Councillor Gallagher,
Councillor Gibbons,
Councillor Gilroy,
Councillor Healy,
Councillor Higgins,
Councillor T. MacSharry,
Councillor E. McSharry,
Councillor Mullaney,
Councillor Mulvey,
Councillor Nealon®,
Councillor O’Boyle,
Councillor Queenan,
Councillor Taylor,
Councillor Walsh®

® participated in the meeting remotely

OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE:

Mr. Martin Lydon, Chief Executive
Ms. Marie Whelan, Director of Finance
Ms. Emer Concannon, Director of Services
Mr. Jim Molloy, Director of Services
Ms. Margaret McConnell, A/Director of Services
Mr. Frank Moylan, Senior Planner
Ms. Marian O’Callaghan, Senior Architect
Ms. Leonora McConville, Executive Planner
Mr. Terence Cosgrove, Senior Executive Architect
Ms. Siobhán Ryan, Senior Heritage Officer
Ms. Ruth Hanniffy, Biodiversity Officer
Mr. Joe Murphy, Senior Executive Officer
Ms. Sinéad Branley, Meetings Administrator
Ms. Jo Anne McGonigle, Assistant Staff Office

CATHAOIRLEACH:

Cathaoirleach, Councillor Dónal Gilroy, presided.

As it was his first time presiding, he took the opportunity to address a few key points. He emphasised the importance of mutual respect among Members and towards Council officials. He also asked for patience as he familiarised himself with the responsibilities of the role.

Due to ongoing challenges with Members signalling their intention to contribute during meetings, a revised system was under review. In the interim, Members were asked to ensure their request to speak was clearly acknowledged by either the Cathaoirleach or the Meetings Administrator.

Traditionally, each motion on the agenda was read aloud by the Cathaoirleach. Going forward, unless specifically requested, he would not read motions in full. Councillors who wished to read their own motions were welcome to do so.

He noted recurring problems with microphone usage. Since microphones are essential for live streaming, Members were reminded to switch them on and off appropriately.

Mobile phones should be set to silent mode for the duration of meetings. While Standing Order No. 55 prohibits mobile phone use during Council meetings, the Cathaoirleach acknowledged exceptions may be necessary for medical alerts. These can be accommodated provided the device remains in silent mode.

Other issues highlighted were

the need for Members to be present when their motion is called,
Standing Order number 17 states that the agenda shall not contain any motion which has been considered within the previous six months or any motion substantially similar to any motion considered within the previous six months. Any decision on what constitutes a substantially similar motion shall be decided upon by the Cathaoirleach. It is his intention to enforce this rule going forward.
Members were asked to avoid interrupting at the meeting, unless it related to a point of order.
A review of the current agenda format will be undertaken in the Autumn. Members were informed that “Conflicts of Interest” must be included as a dedicated agenda item. Additionally, the format should be made more accessible for individuals with visual impairments. Once a draft of the revised layout has been prepared, it will be brought before the Procedures Committee, followed by the Corporate Policy Group, and subsequently presented at a Plenary Meeting of the Council. Members were invited to share their suggestions on the proposed changes.

1. MINUTES OF MEETING OF SLIGO COUNTY COUNCIL AUDIT COMMITTEE

Proposed by Councillor G. O’Boyle
Seconded by Councillor P. Taylor

AND AGREED

“To note minutes of Sligo County Council Audit Committee meeting held on 11^th March, 2025.”

2. MINUTES OF MEETING OF S.P.C.1 – HOUSING AND GOVERNMENT

Proposed by Councillor B. Gallagher
Seconded by Councillor D. Mulvey

AND AGREED

“To note minutes of meeting of Strategic Policy Committee (SPC1) – Housing and Governance – held on 12^th March, 2025.”

3. MINUTES OF MEETING OF S.P.C. 4 - PLACEMAKING

Proposed by Councillor P. Taylor
Seconded by Councillor A. Higgins

AND AGREED

“To note minutes of meeting of Strategic Policy Committee (SPC4) – Placemaking - held on 26^th March, 2025.”

4. MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SLIGO COUNTY COUNCIL (ATTENDED BY REPRESENTATIVES OF UTILITY PROVIDERS – E.S.B. AND COILLTE)

Proposed by Councillor T. Healy
Seconded by Councillor A. Higgins

AND AGREED

“To confirm minutes of Special Meeting of Sligo County Council held on 26^th May, 2025.”

5. MINUTES OF ORDINARY MEETING OF SLIGO COUNTY COUNCIL

Proposed by Councillor B. Gallagher
Seconded by Councillor M. Casserly

AND AGREED

“To confirm minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Sligo County Council held on 6^th June, 2025.”

6. SECTION 183 – LEASE OF PROPERTY TO SLIGO FUEL SALES LIMITED

Proposed by Councillor A. Gibbons
Seconded by Councillor M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“To approve, pursuant to Section 183 of the Local Government Act 2001, the lease of property at Deep Water Quay Sligo to Sligo Fuel Sales Limited.”

7. PUBLIC REALM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT AT STRANDHILL

The Cathaoirleach confirmed receipt of a resolution to adopt the proposal, with a minor amendment submitted by Councillor Bree and seconded by Councillor Nealon.

Councillor Bree opened the discussion, highlighting public submissions - particularly from the Strandhill Community Development Association. He welcomed the scheme’s recognition of the tradition of older people parking at the seafront to view the sea and noted that many public suggestions had been incorporated by the Planning Department.

The four most common concerns raised were:

Shorefront car parking
Relocation of the cannon
Coastal erosion
Lack of public toilets

Members were informed that a coastal erosion and flood risk study was completed in 2024, with an €800,000 application submitted to the Office of Public Works. An additional €30,000 was received earlier this year to support further analysis and strengthen the case for a major protection scheme. However, the Public Realm project under discussion is funded by the Rural Regeneration Development Fund, which cannot be used for coastal erosion works.

Councillor Bree also noted that the seafront car park can be congested and hazardous on busy days, especially for families. A recent survey showed nearly 20% of spaces were occupied by the same vehicle for an entire Saturday, which he felt was unfair. He suggested able-bodied drivers use the upper car park, reserving shorefront spaces for those with greater need.

Finally, he emphasised that many submissions opposed relocating the cannon, and he supported keeping it in its current position.

It was then

Proposed by Councillor D. Bree
Seconded by Councillor F. Nealon

“That Sligo County Council having considered the many submissions made by members of the public, including the submission made by the Strandhill Community Development Association, and having considered the Chief Executive’s Report prepared pursuant to Section 179 of Part XI of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) on the proposed development consisting of public realm enhancement works at Strandhill village, County Sligo (Td. Carrowbunnaun) including the following:

Public realm enhancement works on the L-3504-0 (to the west of the main Council car park) and on the shorefront (Promenade) including narrowing and reconfiguring of the carriageway and widening and repaving footpaths.

Re-allocation of car parking spaces from the shore front parking area to the main Council car park to provide a total of 365 car parking spaces, including 27 accessible spaces and 6 motor bike spaces. 42 of these spaces shall be on the shore front.
Two new loading bays on the shore front,
Traffic management measures on Shore Road,
New landscaping, street lighting, street furniture and road signage,
Relocation of the Cannon (a protected structure) 57m to the southwest,
Associated site development works

approve the carrying out of the proposed development in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief Executive, subject to the retention of the cannon in its present location at the sea front.”

Councillor T. MacSharry said he firmly believed that funding for projects is good if it is what the people want and it enhances, benefits and improves an area. He did not feel that this proposal would do that. He felt it was a retrograde step that would do untold damage. If the resolution was agreed, he felt that the people of Sligo would not forgive the decision made at this meeting.

Some points he wished to raise, as he had done in the past, were that Members were not aware of what this project would cost. It was his opinion that the first consultation process had been nothing short of a farce as it had taken place on a windy day with some of the paperwork blown away. It had fallen far short of what a good consultation process should start with.

Further, his opinion was that all the award-winning businesses based at the shorefront were not happy with the proposal and are against it. They are not against enhancement works or safety measures, but against the current proposal. It was his belief, together with a lot of people in the community, that this will kill the spirit, soul and everything that is good about Strandhill.

Elected Members in the Municipal District had called for a survey and he quoted from comments made by “Meehan and Tully”. A business interruption and economic impact survey had been sought. That had not been forthcoming. However, “Meehan and Tully” had reported that “any significant structural changes that disrupt the flow (i.e. the traffic) and the works would certainly result in businesses having to operate seasonally rather than year ‘round. This will impact upon employment, the viability of businesses and the overall attractiveness of Strandhill promenade as a destination for local people and visitors.”

Councillor T. MacSharry continued that business in Strandhill had already been adversely affected with the loss of the Peoples’ Market. This proposal would have an adverse and detrimental effect on the businesses in the area. To be in business today is harder than ever before, he added, and a full-time business cannot be reduced to a seasonal business. Sligo also does not have the weather for this project with inclement weather for parts of the year. This would cause difficulties for people walking from the car park to the shorefront.

The development of the Maritime Centre at this location was highlighted by Councillor T. MacSharry. The potential of the Surf Centre had to be a focus, with Strandhill regarded as a surf mecca in the world with huge potential for competitions at this location.

For many, Strandhill represents a place where people can go, buy a coffee, enjoy the shorefront and look out at the sea. This has been a tradition for a lot of Sligo people. People of all ages are now struggling, more than ever before, with their mental health. The proposal to reduce car parking spaces at the cannon end of the car park will have a detrimental impact on that.

Having been in Strandhill on the day before the meeting, he noted that the village was a sea of activity with all businesses busy, and he had felt that nothing was wrong with the current layout.

In noting points made by Councillor Bree regarding coastal erosion, people were still asking for the local authority to deal with this, and it was time for action. In conclusion, he urged caution and asked Members not to vote on the proposal in its current form.

As seconder of the proposal, Councillor Nealon said some things had been misrepresented. Through the project, there will be an overall gain in car parking spaces. This should encourage people who are able to walk to do so. As a resident of Strandhill, with young children, he felt that there would be accident at the seafront if it went unchanged. He did not agree that every business was against the project and did not have evidence to confirm that from the submissions made by the public.

The Strandhill Community Development Association, a long-standing, representative Body for Strandhill had made their submission. Its members are elected at an A.G.M. which is open to attendance by all residents and businesses in Strandhill. Their remit is to seek to improve the lives of Strandhill residents by providing an avenue through which community facilities can be improved. Their submission had been received, and they had approved the scheme therein. They had also noted some modifications they would like to see included. Their number one priority was that the cannon is not moved. This amendment had been included in the proposal from Councillor Bree at the meeting. Other suggestions put forward had been responded to favourably by the Chief Executive, e.g. traffic management, signage indicating when the shorefront was full, ensuring the works are carried out considering the seasonality of the businesses; with works carried out in the wintertime and not during the busy season. Councillor Nealon concluded by saying that most people are in favour of the project and he was, therefore, supporting it and asking his fellow Councillors to do the same.

Councillor Higgins indicated that she wished to support Councillor Bree’s motion. Members of Sligo Borough Municipal District had met several times on this proposal and had received detailed briefings from the Planning team. Subject to the cannon remaining at its current location, she would be happy to support the progression of the project to the next phase. Ms. McConville, Mr. Moylan and their team were commended by Councillor Higgins for their level of dedication and professionalism. It had to be noted that the consultation was extensive and had been more than an on-line portal. There had been pop up tents on the shoreline and despite inclement weather they had gathered very comprehensive, face to face, feedback from the community. Ms. McConville had been in the area at weekends monitoring the traffic flow. This showed the level of dedication to arrive at an evidence-based decision and had to be acknowledged.

In continuing, Councillor Higgins felt that this is a positive development overall, not just for the community living in Strandhill but for the people of Sligo, together with domestic and international tourists. It was acknowledged that not everybody would be happy with the proposed changes and the key objections had been identified by Councillor Bree. It was her hope that the Media would make the public aware that this fund does not and will not detract or delay any coastal erosion measures with it being a separate funding stream. The priority for Sligo County Council is to address that.

The reduction of car parking spaces at the shorefront had been spoken about and she agreed with points made by Councillor T. MacSharry that people like to drive to Strandhill, park at the shorefront and look at the sea. This was a valid concern, and it was important that it would be acknowledged and addressed. However, as had been said, the shorefront has become a congested car park with spectacular views. This proposed change, as had been said by Councillor Nealon, would see an increase in car parking spaces in Strandhill. This will require a behavioural change by the able-bodied community to walk the 200 metres from the main car park or avail of the significantly improved public transport.

The proposed project will improve the enjoyment of the fantastic amenity for all the stakeholders, for the families, the tourists and the walkers and, therefore, she was happy to support it.

Councillor O’Boyle added his support for the project. Meetings have taken place on the issue for approximately three years. With the major concern having been that the cannon would not be moved, he urged people to support it considering the length of time it had been discussed.

In acknowledging the people who had contacted him with their concerns regarding the proposal, Councillor Clarke said he wished to thank the Executive for their engagement and the assurances they had given him that this is a positive development for Strandhill. It was noted that most of the Councillors in the Sligo-Strandhill Municipal District are in favour of the proposal. While he did not wish to stand in the way of the project, it was his hope that as the construction takes place, the people opposed to it will accept that the representations have been made and that, on balance, it is a positive development. It was good that people showed their concerns regarding developments as it ensures the right product is delivered.

Councillor Gibbons advised the meeting that he had been involved in a lot of the consultations which had taken place to date. The main concern people had contacted him with had been in relation to people with mental disabilities who currently avail of the parking at the seafront when they visit Strandhill. The project is very presentable, he said, but he had concerns as to its policing. Having been involved in work with people with disabilities and, as Chairperson of a very large disability organisation in Sligo, it had been people with mental health issues who had approached him. They felt that something was being taken away from them. If the project is not being policed, those people will not be guaranteed a space at the shorefront. While most people can walk the 200 metres involved, there are occasions when people cannot do that. Sometimes, in his own experience of visiting Strandhill and supporting the businesses there, if he is in a situation where he feels unable to walk unaided and cannot park at the shorefront, he will not travel to Strandhill but will travel to an accessible location. The work gone into the project, which he regarded as second to none, was also recognised by Councillor Gibbons and he commended the team involved. However, he felt he could not support the project.

In referring to the large number of submissions received, Councillor Brennan said the concerns regarding the moving of the cannon had been referred to earlier. Also, the submissions had referred to the provision of public toilets. In noting that the Members had been advised it is not part of the scheme now, he said there will be a need for that or some other scheme to be introduced. It was felt that it was not fair on businesses trying to accommodate people using their toilets. It would be important that this scheme would be supported, followed by the supply of public toilets.

Councillor Taylor said he would be led by the Local Representatives on this issue but he wanted to acknowledge the contribution of former Councillor, Sinéad Maguire, who had brought this to Sligo County Council many years ago and it had moved on from that point. Her contribution should be acknowledged at this time.

The Cathaoirleach said he agreed with a lot of what had been said but did not agree with everything. However, there had not been any plan on any issue in the Council that he could agree with everything. There is a problem with the car park being 200 metres away and that is that the footpath is not wide enough for people to meet on it. This was an issue particularly when there was somebody with enhanced mobility issues requiring the use of a wheelchair or children in buggies. This plan would deal with that.

Another major issue was people stepping into the road with traffic moving in both directions. The Cathaoirleach noted comments regarding people travelling to Strandhill for their own mental health and said he was aware of this on a personal level. Comments made by Councillor Gibbons on this matter were acknowledged by him and he added that the sea is a great healer. Perhaps Sligo County Council needs to examine other locations throughout the county where a viewing area of the sea could be incorporated, he concluded.

As there had been comments rather than questions, Mr. Moylan wished to make some points on the matter. The aim of the project is to transform what has become a car dominated area into a welcoming, accessible space where pedestrians can truly enjoy the seaside promenade experience. This will be achieved by increasing the parking in the upper car park and promoting its usage as the primary place for people to come to Strandhill and park their car. The Shore Road will become safer by widening footpaths to reduce traffic speeds and the shorefront itself will be reconfigured as an attractive civic space for use by locals and visitors. Parking spaces will still be available at the shorefront, but it is hoped, through behavioural changes, that these will be used and reserved for people who need them the most. The design of the project started over four years ago involving many types of public consultation, including the one referred to where there was a marquee in the car park. This was to facilitate people who prefer face-to-face consultation. It also involved online consultation.

The project will be funded through the Rural Regeneration Development Fund. With support, the project has the potential to revitalise rural towns and villages in line with national town centre first policies. The Chief Executive’s Report before the Members for their consideration indicated the large volume of submissions received on the project. Some were from those who were concerned about the making of changes to the shorefront area and many others who felt that something better must be possible.

The design of the project itself had evolved over several phases of consultation. The scheme now before the Members represented a careful balance between the various views expressed over that time. Ultimately, the recommendation of the Chief Executive’s Report was to proceed with the scheme as it will preserve what makes Strandhill special, while making sure it can be enjoyed safely and sustainably for generations to come.

Regarding the proposed modification in the resolution, the Planning Authority did not have any objection. It was not felt that it would affect, in any meaningful way, the overall vision of the scheme.

Councillor Walsh referred to several representations he had also received, and he was delighted to see the amendment being brought forward in relation to the cannon. It was not his opinion that all the businesses are opposed to the project. Any business owner he had spoken with was very supportive of the scheme, with the amendments as outlined. All the URDF and RRDF projects had an element of change which people can struggle with until the scheme is delivered. Once delivered, or in its final phases, many of those people come on board and this had been seen with other projects delivered in the county in the past.

As had been said by Councillor Taylor in reference to former Councillor, Sinéad Maguire, he was also aware of her having been very supportive of this and spending a lot of time on the matter in the past.

On balance, he said he agreed with most of the Members that this is the best way forward. Every town and village in the country is moving towards a more accessible, friendlier space in their centres and most European countries were ahead in this regard. For this reason, he would be supporting the motion with the amendment.

The Cathaoirleach informed the meeting that a vote would be taken. The result was as follows:

FOR:    Councillors Bree, Brennan, Casserly, Gallagher, Gilroy, Higgins, Mullaney, Mulvey, Nealon, O’Boyle, Queenan, Taylor and Walsh (13)
AGAINST:        Councillors Gibbons, MacSharry, T. and McSharry, E. (3)
ABSTAINED:   Councillors Clarke and Healy (2)

The Cathaoirleach deemed the resolution CARRIED.

8. SOCIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT PIRN MILL ROAD, RATHEDMOND TD., SLIGO

Proposed by Councillor G. O’Boyle
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“To proceed with the proposed development at Pirn Mill Road, Rathedmond Townland, Sligo consisting of:

The construction of 20 no. new dwellings in 2no. 2-storey terraces and 1no. 4 storey block, comprising 8 No. 1 bed apartments and 12 No. 2 bed apartments and all associated site development works including 2no. new pedestrianised laneways, realignment of road edge to Pirn Mill Road, part demolition of existing boundary wall to the footpath by N4, new site boundaries, public open space, drainage, utilities and services connections, car parking and ancillary site works.

In accordance with the Chief Executive’s Report and pursuant to Section 179(3) and 179(4) of Part XI of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as Amended).”

9. SOCIAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT OWENMORE CRESCENT (CORRÁN NA HABHANN), COLLOONEY TOWNLAND

Proposed by Councillor T. Healy
Seconded by Councillor M. Casserly

AND AGREED

“To proceed with the proposed development at Owenmore Crescent (Corrán na hAbhann), Collooney Townland, Collooney, Co. Sligo consisting of:

The construction of 31 no. one, two and three storey dwellings comprising of 8 one-bedroom apartments, 4 two-bedroom apartments, 9 two-bedroom houses, 7 three-bedroom houses, 1 four-bedroom house and 2 five-bedroom houses together with all associated site works, including site access, new site boundaries, drainage, associated earthworks, roadworks, Public Open Space, new utilities and services connections and car parking. All associated landscaping works are included.

In accordance with the Chief Executive’s Report and pursuant to Section 179(3) and 179(4) of Part XI of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as Amended).”

Councillor Healy extended his thanks to Ms. O’Callaghan and her team for their work on the matter, noting that public consultations had effectively addressed concerns from the Collooney community. He acknowledged and appreciated their valuable support and contribution

10. DRAFT COUNTY SLIGO BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2025-2030

As Chair of the Biodiversity Working Group, the Cathaoirleach wished to propose the resolution on this item.

Proposed by Councillor D. Gilroy
Seconded by Councillor M. Casserly

AND AGREED

“Following consideration of the draft County Sligo Biodiversity Action Plan 2025-2030, approval is given by Sligo County Council to proceed to Stage 2 public consultation.”

11. MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR QUARTER 2 OF 2025

The Members agreed to note the Management Report for Q2 of 2025.

12. DATE FOR SEPTEMBER PLENARY MEETING AND MEETING WITH CANDIDATES FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

a) The date for the September Plenary meeting had been discussed at the Corporate Policy Group meeting earlier in the day. Members had suggested holding the Plenary Meeting on 8^th September, 2025 at 10.00 a.m. and this was agreed.

b) It was further proposed that a meeting would be held at 00 p.m. on 8^th September, 2025 to invite in any prospective Presidential candidates seeking the support of Sligo County Council. They would be strictly limited to speaking for ten minutes and could only do so at the podium. Discussions with Members would not take place at that meeting. Members would listen to their presentations, without questions, and would then make their decision on what they wished to do.

Councillor Bree asked the Cathaoirleach who would determine the invitees for the 3.00 p.m. meeting. The Cathaoirleach clarified that the Corporate Policy Group had agreed to allow any interested individuals to participate, following the precedent set during the previous Presidential Election.

After an extended discussion, it was agreed that Council Members would convene to review all submitted proposals. Based on this review, invitations could be extended to candidates they wished to hear further from. This meeting would be held in camera, given the nature of the discussions involving individuals. Legal advice would also be sought to ensure the process adhered to democratic principles. The meeting was scheduled to follow the September Plenary Meeting, with the option to call a Special Meeting thereafter if deemed necessary.

13. SUPPORT FOR “TOWN AND CITY GIFT CARD” ROLLOUT

At the request of Councillor Walsh, consideration of this item was deferred to the agenda of the September Ordinary Meeting:

“Given the huge success of the Love Sligo Gift Card since its launch in 2024, and it having achieved over €1M in sales within a year in Sligo, over €10M in gift card sales in Ireland, driving an estimated 150,000 in-store consumers across the country:

That Sligo County Council writes to Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment and the Minister for Rural Affairs to ask them to consider supporting the Town and City Gift Card rollout across every county. That this motion be shared with each Local Authority in the country.”

14. QUERIES FOR UISCE ÉIREANN

Proposed by Councillor B. Gallagher
Seconded by Councillor P. Taylor

AND AGREED

“I call on Sligo County Council to contact Uisce Éireann in relation to the following:

Why Uisce Éireann did not send representation on their behalf when invited to our Storm Éowyn meeting on 26/05/2025.
Can we get an update of what protocols Uisce Éireann have put in place following Storm Éowyn to future proof that the same issues do not happen again.

Can we get an update please on what Uisce Éireann is doing to reduce the connection offer wait time from 16 weeks and also the actual connection wait time which can be up to another 16 weeks? This is totally unacceptable from an Irish Utility Company.”

Councillor Gallagher referenced the Special Meeting held on 26th May, attended by representatives from Coillte and the E.S.B. He clarified that Uisce Éireann was not responsible for the issues arising during Storm Éowyn. However, recommendations were made for the installation of on-site generators to maintain power to reservoirs and pumping stations. Power outages had left farmers in South Sligo without water for several weeks.

He also highlighted the prolonged delays in securing water and sewer connections. One example involved an estate of 50 houses that remained unsold for over a year due to utility connection delays. Another case involved a community group facing confusion and extended wait times regarding an application to install a toilet in their premises. Although Uisce Éireann had met with Sligo County Council Members earlier this year and acknowledged certain problems, Councillor Gallagher expressed concern that these issues were still not being adequately addressed.

The points made were supported by Councillor Taylor with him noting the network not being what it should be in certain areas. Reference was made to difficulties with a watermain in south Sligo where recurring bursts occur and once repaired, the same watermain bursts again further along that line.

Councillor O’Boyle supported the motion, particularly in relation to the lengthy delays involved with connections.

Regarding the Special Meeting held in May, Councillor Healy suggested that Uisce Éireann and EIR should be regularly contacted and invited to attend future meetings, similar to the engagement by Coillte and the E.S.B. He also endorsed the concerns raised about ongoing delays in securing utility connections.

Councillor E. McSharry voiced her support for the concerns raised, expressing disappointment that Uisce Éireann had not shown the courtesy to attend the Special Meeting and engage with Members’ concerns. She described the prolonged delays in securing connections as unacceptable. Despite submitting a representation, the day prior regarding water quality issues in several areas, she had yet to receive a response. She emphasised that Uisce Éireann should attend such meetings and respond promptly to representations made by Members on behalf of their constituents.

The Cathaoirleach advised the meeting that Uisce Éireann had attended a meeting in County Hall in January and his understanding is that they intended to meet the Members on an annual basis. In relation to the lack of a response, he advised Councillor McSharry that she would need to make a formal complaint as he had done in the past.

15. SOLAR POWERED WATER DRINKING FONTS

Proposed by Councillor D. Mulvey
Seconded by Councillor M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“I call on Sligo County Council to get a costing for the installation of solar powered water drinking fonts similar to which other councils have installed. These fonts can be to be situated along our recreational walks and parks”.

Mr. Molloy had advised the Members that it is not possible, at this time, to provide a costing. Costs of installation will have to take account of a number of factors, but primarily the cost of providing a connection to mains water. Connection costs are likely to cost multiples of the cost of any solar powered water drinking font. Additionally, as any font will need to be connected to mains water, power will not be required to ensure a font’s operability.

Councillor Mulvey outlined his reason for listing this item and several Members agreed with the proposal and identified locations where they would be of benefit. At the end of the discussion on the matter, Councillor Mulvey asked that it would be kept under consideration, particularly under tourism projects.

16. AVERAGE SPEED CAMERAS ON THE N15 AND N17 NATIONAL PRIMARY ROUTES

Proposed by Councillor M. Casserly
Seconded by Councillor D. Mulvey

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council writes to Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) and An Garda Síochána requesting the urgent assessment and installation of average speed cameras on the N15 and N17 national primary routes within County Sligo, in the interest of improving road safety, reducing incidents of speeding, and preventing further serious collisions.”

Councillor Higgins expressed her support for the motion, highlighting yet another tragic week on Irish roads. She acknowledged the value of speed cameras, as noted by Councillor Mulvey, but stressed the need for increased Garda presence and additional resources for the Traffic Corps to enhance enforcement.

Councillor Mullaney emphasised that enforcement is critical. While existing speed limits are appropriate, they are not consistently enforced. Speed cameras offer a practical solution, and beyond fatality statistics, many individuals suffer life-altering injuries, placing a significant burden on the State. Investment in speed camera infrastructure could help reduce serious accidents by slowing traffic.

Concluding the discussion, the Cathaoirleach supported the motion’s intent and proposed amending its wording to include “fixed and average speed cameras.” Councillor Casserly agreed, noting that average speed cameras are a newer technology and would be well-suited to routes such as the N15 and N17.

SOCIAL AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING - “RATHELLEN”, FINISKLIN

As items 17, 18, 35 and 42 all referred to housing project at “Rathellen”, Finisklin, the Cathaoirleach dealt with these motions at this time.

17.

Proposed by Councillor M. Casserly
Seconded by Councillors A. Gibbons, T. Healy, D. Bree and E. McSharry

“To call on the Department of Housing to provide direct capital funding to Sligo County Council to enable it to build social and affordable housing directly, starting with the delayed 63-unit project at Rathellen, Finisklin.

It highlights that:

PPP models are expensive, slow, and less flexible.

Direct local authority builds offer better value, long-term public ownership, and quicker delivery.

Sligo County Council has the capacity and land but needs funding and staffing support to scale up housing delivery.

The motion urges the government to shift policy away from PPPs and support council-led housing development as a strategic, efficient response to the housing crisis in Sligo and nationally.”

18.

Proposed by Councillor A. Gibbons
Seconded by Councillor T. Healy, M. Casserly, D. Bree and E. McSharry

AND AGREED

“That this local Authority expresses deep concern at the announcement by the Minister for Housing to delay the construction of social housing at Rathellen site far Finisklin, totalling 63 homes. This local authority calls on the Minister to immediately provide funding straight to Sligo County Council to deliver these much-needed homes.”

35.

Proposed by Councillor D. Bree
Seconded by Councillor A. Gibbons, T. Healy, M. Casserly and E. McSharry

“Aware that there are in excess of 1,600 households on this Councils Housing Waiting List and noting the decision taken by the Minister for Housing not to proceed with the Public Private Partnership project which was to deliver 63 social housing units at Rathellen, Finisklin; this Council now calls on the Minister and the Government to provide the necessary funding directly to Sligo County Council so as to allow the Council deliver a housing scheme at Rathellen, in a speedy and efficient manner.”

42.

Proposed by Councillor E. McSharry
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree, A. Gibbons, T. Healy and M. Casserly

“That the Council:

Seeks an update from the Chief Executive on the 63-unit social housing development at Finisklin, which was part of the national Public Private Partnership (PPP) Bundle 3 and has now been paused by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage.
Requests clarification on the following:

(a) What specific communication has been received from the Department regarding the reasons for pausing the project;
(b) Whether this decision is expected to cause any delay in the timeline for construction or completion;
(c) What contingency measures or alternative plans are being considered or have been requested by the Department to ensure the project progresses without significant delay;
(d) Whether there is a revised delivery timeframe available and what the implications are for meeting social housing need in Sligo.

Further calls on Sligo County Council to write to the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage and to the National Development Finance Agency (NDFA) to:

(a) Request an urgent response outlining how the 63-unit scheme at Finisklin is to be progressed;
(b) Seek assurances that this development will be prioritised and protected from delay in any revised delivery strategy for PPP Bundle 3;
(c) Ask for confirmation of the contingency arrangements now being put in place to maintain the delivery pipeline for social housing in Sligo;
(d) Reaffirm the importance of delivering these homes at the earliest possible date, given the acute social housing demand in the Sligo area.

Notes the urgency of progressing this development given the planning permission is already secured and the project is in a shovel-ready state, and expresses concern that delays at this stage could significantly impact on the current homeless situation and local housing provision.”

Councillor Casserly opened the discussion by noting that, since submitting her motion, Minister Browne had announced new initiatives that partially align with its objectives. However, they fall short of addressing the core issue she raised—namely, the need for direct, Council-led building capacity. While the early 2025 funding package included €436 million for social housing and €168 million for cost rental and affordable purchase schemes, much of this funding is directed through acquisitions or approved housing bodies. Her motion specifically called for capital funding earmarked for Council-led construction, which remains unaddressed. She highlighted the absence of ring-fenced funding for stalled Council projects such as “Rathellen,” despite the availability of land and planning readiness. Sligo County Council has the potential to deliver long-term, cost-effective housing, but only with the necessary capital investment and staffing resources. In closing, Councillor Casserly welcomed the Government’s housing measures but stressed they do not go far enough. Sligo has the land, plans, and local expertise to deliver—what’s needed now is direct investment.

Councillor Gibbons acknowledged that many of the points raised by Councillor Casserly reflected the concerns outlined in his own motion. He described the delay in delivering the 63 homes at “Rathellen” as a significant setback for Sligo County Council, particularly for the Borough Councillors, given the development’s proximity to their area. He expressed concern that the Government was actively obstructing the construction of these homes and feared similar interference in future projects. Extensive consultation had gone into this Public-Private Partnership (PPP), yet the Government was now deeming it too costly. Councillor Gibbons emphasised that the housing crisis would not resolve itself and argued that the Council should receive direct funding from the Government. He noted that national housing policy targets were not being met, with the delay of the “Rathellen” development serving as a clear example. He then questioned whether a delegation meeting with the Minister might help move the issue forward. While discussion in the Chamber was important, he suggested that direct engagement with the Minister could be more effective. He called on Government-aligned Councillors to consider arranging such a meeting or to advocate on behalf of Sligo County Council.

The Cathaoirleach advised the meeting that there may be a Judicial Review in process from one of the people involved and he asked Members to be careful in what they would say.

Councillor Healy described the situation as deeply disappointing for Sligo, as well as for the other counties affected by the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme. He stated that PPPs have consistently failed to deliver and continue to fall short. He asserted that Sligo County Council is fully capable of constructing the homes itself. He criticised the Government for claiming that private developers were not building houses, while simultaneously halting progress on this development. Councillors are contacted daily by constituents facing housing challenges, he said, and stressed that immediate action must be taken to escalate the issue with the Minister for Housing.

Councillor Bree described the Minister for Housing’s decision to halt the Public-Private Partnership for 63 social housing units in Finisklin as a major setback to Sligo County Council’s housing programme. With tenders already received and construction expected to begin, the cancellation is unacceptable—especially during a housing crisis, with over 1,600 households on the waiting list.

This phase included 18 duplexes, 39 houses, and six units in “Rathellen House”. Councillor Bree called for direct Government funding to enable the Council to deliver the scheme swiftly. He criticised successive Governments for outsourcing housing to the market, developers, and investor funds, arguing that profit-driven models fail to meet real housing needs. He emphasised that homelessness, long waiting lists, and soaring rents are symptoms of flawed policy—and that the solution lies in universally accessible public housing. He reiterated his long-standing call for a large-scale public house-building programme led by local authorities, substantial investment in affordable housing, and the constitutional recognition of the right to housing. He then formally moved his motion.

Councillor E. McSharry, in referring to her motion, said she had sought clarity as to what was the plan. The response received from the Director of Services, Ms. Concannon, to the motion was as follows:

“The Housing Capital Team are currently in discussion with the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage regarding the options available to progress the delivery of the 63 unit scheme.

Correspondence received from the Department on the 3^rd June, 2025 indicated that the Department had decided not to proceed with contract award, as the overall costs of the SHB3 project were considered too high. This information was shared with all Elected Members by e-mail on Monday, 9^th June, 2025.

There will be a delay in the delivery of the Rathellen project, whilst the most appropriate option to progress the scheme is determined, including an appropriate procurement process and form of contract for the delivery of the scheme.

The Housing Capital Team are currently in discussion with the Department regarding the options available to progress the delivery of the 63 unit scheme.

A revised delivery timeframe is not available at this point, but Members will be advised as soon as an alternative delivery strategy is approved by the DHLGH.”

Councillor E. McSharry acknowledged the report and expressed disappointment over the project's pause due to high costs. While mindful of avoiding wasteful spending—citing the Children’s Hospital as an example—she stressed that the housing crisis demands urgent action. With over 1,600 households on the waiting list and 142 people homeless in Sligo, including 48 children, she emphasised that Sligo is a housing “hot spot.” The “Rathellen” development is shovel-ready and should be prioritised.

Referencing Councillor Casserly’s remarks, it was noted that Minister Browne recently offered some clarity on investment in Council-built housing, which she believes is the right approach. However, further detail is needed. As outlined in her motion, she requested that Sligo County Council write to the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage to urgently seek clarity on the future of the 63-unit Finisklin scheme. The letter should request assurances that the project will be prioritised, protected from delays in any revised PPP strategy, and ask for contingency plans to safeguard Sligo’s social housing pipeline. She stressed the urgent need to deliver these homes given the severe local demand.

Councillor E. McSharry voiced support for the motions raised and emphasised that Sligo must be funded and prioritised. The delay is deeply concerning for those seeking housing and regularly contacting Elected Members. While Minister Browne is addressing the issue, she stressed that Sligo’s shovel-ready project demands urgent attention and action.

Councillor Higgins supported all motions and criticised the Government’s housing policy as broken and unable to meet its own targets—an assessment backed by independent reviews. She argued that Ireland’s development-led, profit-driven housing market prioritises investment over liveability, turning homes into speculative assets rather than places to live and raise families.

Drawing on her experience as an economics lecturer, she noted that while supply affects prices, Minister Browne’s suggestion that increasing supply alone will solve the crisis is overly simplistic. The current market favours developers and investors, repeating mistakes of the past.

She called for a fundamental reset of housing policy—shifting focus from speculative demand to user-based ownership and stable, affordable rental. This includes differential taxation for investment properties, penalties for vacancy and dereliction, zoning for owner-occupiers, and linking landlord incentives to actual new supply.

Councillor Higgins endorsed giving local authorities a greater role in housing delivery, as recommended by the Housing Commission, and advocated for direct capital investment, support for regional builders, streamlined planning, and workforce development to meet housing needs.

Councillor O’Boyle supported the motions and asked that Members be given details of any discussions between the Department and Sligo County Council. While Sligo is listed under PPP Phase 3, he understood the Council had sought inclusion in the initial phase. He also highlighted the ongoing issue of supply and demand, noting that census data still shows 3,950 vacant homes in the area and stressed the need to actively pursue Compulsory Purchase Orders to address this.

Councillor Clarke highlighted a key issue in housing delivery: the limited pool of construction companies eligible to build public housing. When these few firms reach capacity, costs rise. Many capable builders are excluded from bidding simply because they haven’t previously built public housing, leaving only two or three companies able to tender for such projects.

He urged the Government to review this restrictive tendering process to broaden participation. He also noted that Irish Water has not delivered any new sewerage or water infrastructure in Sligo or the northwest over the past year. While he acknowledged the rationale behind pausing the project to avoid setting a precedent for high-cost housing, he stressed the need for reform in procurement to improve affordability and access.

Councillor Walsh supported the motions and expressed disappointment that the Department had known the tender costs since June 2024 yet only halted the project in late November after the preferred bidder was named by the NDFA. He felt the scheme should have been paused earlier, avoiding unnecessary delays and the resulting disruption.

Over 100 professionals—many based in Sligo and working in SMEs—had invested significant time in the project, and the late cancellation will likely lead to job losses in those firms. While the cost per unit was high and would have drawn criticism had the project proceeded, he noted that the Department and Minister had already acknowledged the bundle was unworkable. He hoped individual projects could still move forward under a revised procurement process. For him, the most frustrating aspect was the delay between the June tender return and the eventual decision to pull the scheme.

The Cathaoirleach then closed the discussion by saying that everyone would like to see the project moved on. The best way would be through the Council’s own team and all agreed on that. The letter would issue to the Minister based on all that had been said.

19. EXPANSION OF ROLLOUT OF EPI-PENS

Proposed by Councillor D. Mulvey
Seconded by Councillor M. Casserly

AND AGREED

“I call on Sligo County Council to write to the Minister for Health to seek the expansion of the rollout of EpiPens for people who suffer with severe allergies, the threat of an allergic reaction is ever-present. EpiPens should be available in public spaces across the country alongside defibrillators.

In most cases a shot of adrenaline – using an EpiPen – is needed immediately, but this is not always straightforward, particularly for children.”

20. SUPPORT FOR IRISH ROAD HAULAGE ASSOCATION (IRHA)

Proposed by Councillor D. Mulvey
Seconded by Councillor G. Mullaney

AND AGREED

“That this Council supports the Irish Road Haulage Association (IRHA) call on government to take action to address the crisis of driver and mechanic shortages within the licensed haulage sector. According to the association, the bureaucracy involving multiple government departments is hindering recruitment efforts, with employers facing frustrating delays.

I have been informed that the existing system is inefficient, requiring nine separate steps and potentially up to two years to get a qualified driver on the road. This bureaucratic impediment not only delays the onboarding process but also results in a significant drop out rate of candidates, with many failing to show up after extensive waits.

The association has called for the establishment of a cross-departmental working group led by the Department of Enterprise, coordinating with departments such as Transport, Foreign Affairs, Justice, Social Protection, RSA, and Revenue to streamline processes.

The IRHA has reported that domestic recruitment avenues are nearly exhausted, and while they are looking to recruit from some countries where the cumbersome visa process sometimes taking up to five months also poses further challenges, leading many candidates to seek employment elsewhere before completion.

The situation highlights an urgent need for reform in the recruitment and onboarding processes to sustain the economy and support the haulage industry.”

21. UPDATE ON DERELICT PROPERTIES

Proposed by Councillor T. Walsh
Seconded by Councillor D. Mulvey

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council give an update on the derelict properties listed on the Derelict Sites Register, an update on the number of properties under investigation and what stage each are at, the number of properties where the owner has constructively engaged/replied to the Local Authority.”

The Cathaoirleach referred to the detailed report which had been furnished to the Elected Members by Ms. Concannon in response to this motion. Among the details provided was that there are currently 41 properties on the Derelict Sites Register. Properties are added to the Register where there is no meaningful engagement from the owner or there is no progress being made to bring the property back into use.

Adding properties to the Derelict Sites Register is one of the many tools used by the Derelict Sites Team to bring properties back into use. Following the completion of a countywide survey, the Derelict Sites database included 275 properties (up from 119 at the start of 2025). The Team is going through the process of identifying owners and have engaged with 145 owners to date. Schemes and tools used by the Council to bring these properties back to use include the Vacant Property Refurbishment Grant Scheme, Repair and lease scheme and the compulsory acquisition of derelict properties for onward sale.

Where considered appropriate, properties are added to the Derelict Sites Register and the necessary steps are taken to issue Derelict site levies in accordance with the Derelict Sites Act, 1990.

Councillor Walsh thanked the Director for the report and welcomed the addition of the Old Mill Apartments in Ballisodare to the register. He noted the growing number of properties listed and asked if Members could do anything to help accelerate the process. With 41 properties on the register and 275 on the database, he highlighted the scale of the task and acknowledged the positive engagement from property owners with the local authority, which he said was encouraging to see.

In response to Councillor Walsh’s queries, Ms. Concannon explained that while 275 properties are listed in the database—based on a county-wide survey—Sligo County Council is actively engaging with 145 of them. The Derelict Sites Register is used as a last resort, with the Council prioritising direct engagement to bring properties back into use. She highlighted the success of initiatives like the Vacant Property Refurbishment Grant, the Repair and Leasing Scheme, and compulsory acquisitions for resale. The dedicated team has more than doubled its active cases in 2025, with visible progress. Councillor Walsh thanked the Director of Services and welcomed the use of compulsory acquisitions. He acknowledged that the register is a final measure but was encouraged by the Council’s proactive approach to tackling vacancy.

22. UPDATE IN RELATION TO PARKING IN SLIGO TOWN CENTRE

Proposed by Councillor T. Walsh
Seconded by Councillor M. Casserly

AND AGREED

“In light of the imminent publication of the Pathfinder Programme, Carraroe to Sligo City Centre and Sligo City Centre to Sligo ATU: can the Local Authority provide with an update in relation to parking in Sligo town centre and if any further progress has been made on the identification of a site in the centre for accessible parking.”

Mr. Molloy had reported that the adopted Local Transport Plan (LTP) for Sligo town outlines that there is a high level of parking within Sligo (>3000 spaces). The LTP places significant emphasis on providing park and ride options from the north side of the county into Sligo town, and similar from the south side. The Wine Street Master Plan, which is currently at concept stage, has the potential to provide additional parking for the town core area.

While noting the report, he emphasised the urgent need for additional parking in Sligo town centre to support retail access, as existing car parks are consistently full. Upcoming developments like Burton Street and the Active Travel scheme will further reduce parking availability, making offset solutions essential. He referenced previous discussions about a potential car park on a site owned by Dunnes Stores and asked if any progress had been made. With the Wine Street masterplan still years away, he sought clarification on any recent engagement with landowners. Local businesses are deeply concerned, and he urged that any feasible measures to offset imminent parking losses be pursued without delay.

Councillor Casserly supported the motion and recalled Brían Flynn’s point that hundreds of parking spaces exist within 700 metres of the Lady Erin statue. She stressed the importance of reinforcing that message, as the perception of limited parking is harming local businesses. Busy car parks reflect a thriving town, yet the negative narrative around parking is misleading and damaging. Similar concerns arise in other large towns, but Sligo’s narrow, historic streets naturally limit central parking. While additional spaces are needed, she emphasised the need to shift the conversation to highlight Sligo’s success and available parking options.

In seeking clarification on a point of information, Councillor O’Boyle enquired if Sligo had the second largest car parking public spaces in the country. If so, he did not think it was as big an issue as was being said.

In response to further queries raised by Councillor Walsh, Mr. Molloy said that the local authority was always seeking to get the balance right between parking and its location. Sligo is an old town which can make it difficult to access. That is balanced off with where the demand is and the prioritisation of the types of parking available in different areas. In relation to the property owned by Dunnes Stores, there had not been any further development at that location.

23. UPDATE ON WOMEN’S REFUGE

Proposed by Councillor G. O’Boyle
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“Can Sligo County Council give an update on a much needed Women's refuge.”

Ms. Concannon had reported to the Elected Members that Sligo County Council are collaborating with CUAN and the Housing Agency to identify an appropriate site to meet the specific needs of a domestic violence refuge for Sligo.

Councillor O’Boyle set out the reasons for listing this matter on the agenda. In noting the response received, he said this was the same as that received in November 2024 and he asked for further clarification.

Ms. Concannon confirmed that Sligo County Council had recently met with CUAN and the Housing Agency where discussions took place regarding several properties close to Sligo town meeting their requirements. A further site meeting was due to take place following this meeting to discuss the options.

Councillor O’Boyle enquired if an actual site had been selected and, in response, the Chief Executive Officer confirmed that Sligo County Council can only offer a site. The rest of it was with CUAN, the Housing Agency and those developing the refuge. The local authority was adamant that they would offer the site and wished to do so. It was then up to the Body to finance the construction of the refuge. Sligo County Council was being supportive of this, understood the need, had progressed it as much as they could and would be offering the sites.

The Chief Executive confirmed, at the request of Councillor O’Boyle, that an update would be made available to the Members at their next meeting.

Councillor Clarke asked for clarification that it was CUAN held responsibility for the refuge. A colleague in Leitrim County Council had advised him that they were relying on Sligo to provide the facility and it was confirmed that it will be a joint Sligo-Leitrim facility.

The Cathaoirleach referred to the sensitivity surrounding the site selection process. A site offered by the local authority may not meet the safety criteria CUAN had to adhere to for users of the facility.

24. CHANGES TO SOCIAL PROTECTION PAYMENTS

Proposed by Councillor G. O’Boyle
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“This Council condemns Fine Gael's proposal to impose lower welfare increases on jobseekers, pensioners or disabled people in Budget 2025 and demands equal cost-of-living increases for all social protection recipients.”

25. COMMEMORATION OF CENTENARY OF COUNTESS MARKIEVICZ IN 2027

Proposed by Councillor A. Higgins
Seconded by Councillor

AND AGREED

“That this Council develops a series of events to commemorate the centenary of Countess Markievicz in 2027. This would include:

the development of a Countess Markievicz Day, similar to W.B Yeats Day, that would become an annual celebration of her life’s work and achievements,

the commissioning of a new statue of Countess Markievicz to be located in the city centre and unveiled on her centenary in 2027.”

A report had been issued to the Members by Mr. Flynn, Director of Services. This advised the Members that Sligo County Council proposes to include the Countess Markievicz Centenary in 2027 in the annual Commemorations Programme for 2026 and 2027, depending on funding being available.

Given the significance of the Countess Markievicz Centenary and the potential scale of a commemorative programme for 2027, it is recommended that Sligo County Council as an initial step, will put in place a Steering Group in late 2025, to oversee the drafting of a plan and programme of events to commemorate the life and work of Countess Markievicz. It is also recommended that a Working Group is established to undertake the groundwork for the drafting and delivery of the plan and the programme of events.

The make-up of the Steering Group would be similar to that of the Decade of Centenary Steering Group.

Councillor Higgins said that she was aware that other Members, including Councillor Bree, had previously put forward motions for the Council’s attention on this matter. The response from the Director of Services was welcomed and she said she was very encouraged that planning for this significant centenary, of both local and national importance, is in hand. Membership of the previous committee, as referred to in the report, was sought by Councillor Higgins, i.e. the Decade of Centenary Steering Group to ensure that all the necessary stakeholders were included. Sligo should use the centenary celebrations to launch an annual Countess Markievicz Day. . This was an opportunity to leverage her connections to Sligo and Lissadell House as a key hook for educational and cultural tourism.

Finally, the response referenced the phrase “subject to funding being available” but Councillor Higgins stated that this was one project that should be prioritised within the limited funding streams. The commissioning of a new statue should feature in this programme of works as Countess Markievicz has earned her place in a prominent location in the centre of Sligo.

Councillor Bree, in seconding the motion, welcomed the response from the Director of Services. It had been 2002 when the Markievicz Millennium Committee had been responsible for ensuring the construction of a monument at Rathcormac in memory of Constance Markievicz. Joe McGowan, Larry Mullen and others had played a significant role in fundraising for the project. The National Millennium Committee, Sligo Corporation and Sligo County Council had all made contributions towards the monument. There had been a significant debate at the time as to where the monument would be located. Among those locations was outside Sligo City Hall, at Markievicz House (H.S.E. building) while others felt it should be in Rathcormac which was the location selected. There had been significant interest from the people in the area and they have taken care of it in the intervening period. A debt of gratitude was owed to Joe McGowan and his Committee for ensuring that monument was erected. Given that 2027 would mark the 100th anniversary of the passing of Countess Markievicz, it would be important that Sligo County Council would play a significant and leading role in remembering her.

Councillor E. McSharry wished to strongly support the motion and agreed with points made by the previous speakers regarding the founder member of Fianna Fáil and the values she fought for as the first woman M.P. in the whole of Europe. It was, therefore, great that she was remembered by all in her own county for the wonderful work she did and the leadership she had shown. This was an excellent motion and she was delighted to see that the work was already in train.

The Cathaoirleach added his support to the motion. In referring to the monument in Rathcormac, he felt that the taking in charge of that site should also be a priority.

ADJOURNMENT

The Meeting was adjourned at 12.20 p.m. and resumed at 12.50 p.m.

26. DRIVER TEST FOR ‘W’ CATEGORY OF VEHICLES (WORK VEHICLES AND TRACTORS)

Proposed by Councillor A. Higgins
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council write to the Minister for Transport Darragh O’Brien and the Road Safety Authority requesting engagement with the relevant stakeholders to facilitate the introduction of separate and specific driver testing for the ‘W’ category drivers for work vehicles and tractors to include:

the removal of automatic issuing of W category license qualification for people who have only completed the testing requirements for the B category license qualification,
the introduction of mandatory Essential Driver Training (EDT) programme (similar to the B category licence requirements) of a minimum of six one hour sessions to be completed before a person can take the driving test for the W category license,

the requirement for the safe display of L and N plates for learner and new W category drivers of work vehicles and tractors.”

27. HOSTING OF COUNCIL OF MINISTERS MEETING IN COUNTY SLIGO

Proposed by Councillor A. Higgins
Seconded by Councillor A. Gibbons

AND AGREED

“As Ireland prepares to take on the role of Presidency of the Council of the EU from July to December 2026, this Council calls on the Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Harris, to approve the hosting of a Council of Ministers meeting in Co Sligo and to engage with Sligo County Council to identify suitable locations across the county. Hosting meetings outside of Dublin aligns with the EU ethos of ‘Democracy in Action’ and provides an opportunity for all citizens to engage with the EU institutions in a meaningful and accessible manner. It will also allow our EU legislators to personally experience our ‘region in transition’.”

28. UPDATE ON ACTIVE TRAVEL PROGRAMME IN SLIGO

At the request of Councillor Walsh, this item was deferred to the agenda for the September Plenary Meeting

“Can Sligo County Council give an update on the Active Travel Programme in Sligo; projects funded in 2025, the stage each project is at and associated delivery timelines, projects still awaiting further approval to move to the next stage by the NTA and the work plan for 2025.”

29. SUPPORTS FOR VULNERABLE PEOPLE WITH COST OF LIVING CRISES

At the request of Councillor Healy, this item was deferred to the agenda for the September Plenary Meeting

“We call on Sligo County Council to use all measures at their disposal to ensure that those struggling with the Cost of Living crises are shielded from any further increases in outgoings. Families and individuals are already facing rising costs from rent and housing costs to day to day groceries, goods and services. This is before we come into the winter months where people are stretched even further and sometimes have to decide between heating or eating.

We further call on this council to engage with relevant ministers and request funding to develop initiatives at a local level, that will ensure the most vulnerable people in our communities are supported in the difficult months ahead.”

30. DEVELOPER PROVIDED INFRASTRUCTURE

Proposed by Councillor G. Mullaney
Seconded by Councillor L. Brennan

AND AGREED

“To ask Sligo County Council how many housing estates are depending on Developer provided infrastructure for wastewater in the county. Has Uisce Éireann been requested to upgrade and take responsibility for them.”

The Director of Services, Mr. Molloy, had furnished the Members with a report as follows

There are a number of housing estates with wastewater treatment works and pumping stations that are not in charge

Ballincar Heights, Ballincar
Corradoo Cottages, Ballinafad
Drumroe, Castlebaldwin
Ríocht na Sí, Ballygawley
Aylesbury pumping station, Second Sea Road, Sligo

While the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage decided that, with effect from 1^st January, 2024, Uisce Éireann be assigned responsibility for the remediation of Developer provided water services infrastructure, issues remain in implementing same. The matter is currently being reviewed by the Developer provided infrastructure steering group comprising the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, C.C.M.A. and Uisce Éireann.

31. ENGAGEMENT WITH NCSE SLIGO RE. AUTISM CLASSES

Proposed by Councillor J. Queenan
Seconded by Councillor M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“To ask the Minister for Education to engage with NCSE Sligo to ensure that autism classes remain open to accommodate their students.”

Following the discussion on this item, Councillor Queenan asked that a letter would also be issued to Minister Michael Moynihan, Minister of State at the Department of Education and Youth and this was agreed.

32. PROTECTION OF RURAL IRELAND AND AMENDMENTS TO PLANNING REGULATIONS

Proposed by Councillor M. Clarke
Seconded by Councillor G. Mullaney

AND AGREED

“That this Council writes to the Taoiseach Micheal Martin T.D. Given that another eight rural primary schools closed their doors, at the end of this year’s term, will he now accept that the government's rural planning policies have devastated rural communities over the past thirty years, closing shops, pubs, post offices and Garda stations. With hundreds of thousands of Irish born young people leaving rural Ireland never to return. Will the government now act to protect rural Ireland and change the planning regulations.”

33. ABOLITION OF MEANS TEST FOR CARERS ALLOWANCE

Proposed by Councillor A. Gibbons
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“That this local authority calls on the Minister for Social Protection Dara Calleary to scrap the means testing of applicants applying for carers allowance, and the periodic means test review of existing carers, as promised by the Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael parties as election promises prior to the 2024 general election.”

34. COMBATING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

Proposed by Councillor A. Gibbons
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“In light of the shocking increase in violence against women as outlined in the recent Women’s Aid report, I am calling on the government to take a realistic zero tolerance stance that will show results in combating all kinds of violence against women.”

36. IMPLEMENTATION OF SLÁINTECARE PROGRAMME

Proposed by Councillor D. Bree
Seconded by Councillor A. Gibbons

AND AGREED

“Recognising the failure and the inequality of Ireland’s current two-tier health system, and further aware that the aim of the proposed Sláintecare programme is to deliver one universal health service for all, providing the right care, in the right place, at the right time; this Council calls on the Government and the Minister for Health to prioritise the implementation of the programme.”

37. APPLICATIONS FROM TENANTS FOR HOUSING ADAPTATION WORKS

Proposed by Councillor D. Bree
Seconded by Councillor A. Gibbons

AND AGREED

“That a report be provided indicating the number of valid applications received from Council tenants for housing adaptation works in the current year, in 2024, 2023 and 2022, the estimated cost of the works involved, the number of those cases where the adaptation works have been completed and the number of those cases where work has yet to commence.”

Councillor Bree thanked the Director of Services and Mr. Joe Murphy, Senior Executive Officer for the comprehensive report furnished to the Members. The report set out the relevant information under the headings requested.

38. USE OF SULPHURIC ACID IN COUNTY SLIGO

Proposed by Councillor D. Gilroy
Seconded by Councillor J. Queenan

AND AGREED

“To ask Sligo County Council if a register is kept of what facilities such as Health, Education and Industry in County Sligo use Sulphuric Acid. If so, what are these facilities? What type of facilities are they and what hazardous waste disposal policies are followed in the county for Sulphuric Acid.”

A report had been prepared for the Members by Director of Services, Mr. Molloy. This advised the Members that Sligo County Council does not maintain a register of facilities that use sulphuric acid as part of their processes or quantities being disposed of as part of commercial activities. There is no obligation under current legislation for local authorities to maintain such a register. Sulphuric acid is a widely used chemical in a range of industrial and commercial activities nationally including the pharmaceutical, health, educational and water treatment sector.

In line with national waste management policies, the onus is on the operator of the facility concerned to dispose of waste materials including any hazardous waste materials in accordance with the requirements of national waste legislation. All hazardous waste materials should be disposed of through an authorised/licensed waste disposal contractor for the waste materials concerned.

39. INSTALLATION OF RAISED TRAFFIC CALMING

Proposed by Councillor D. Gilroy
Seconded by Councillor M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“Following confirmation from Longford County Council that Raised Traffic Calming was installed as part of an active travel Scheme on a national Road (N4) following consultation with TII, Sligo County Council can now proceed to identify where these raised crossings should be installed on National Primary and National Secondary routes within our county before the end of 2025.”

A detailed report had been circulated to the Elected Members by Director of Services, Ms. Concannon. In noting the response from both Longford County Council and Ms. Concannon, the Cathaoirleach said that it was now clear that they can be approved for installation.

Councillor Clarke, in supporting the resolution, said that all pedestrian crossings should be raised instead of the outdated flat crossings. This ensured the safety of the person using them. If two or three could be installed each year, that would be progress.

In supporting the motion, Councillor Gibbons referred to the effectiveness of the crossing installed in Ballygawley.

Further support was added by Councillor Mulvey who said, having spoken with the Area Engineers, while signage can be effective, there needs to be an impairment on the road and they certainly worked as Councillor Gibbons had outlined. Residents in Ballincarrow had been calling for this type of crossing due to more than 50,000 vehicles passing through their village each week on the N17.

In thanking the Members for their support, Councillor Gilroy said it is not Sligo County Council’s fault that motorists are speeding. It is driver behaviour and these works have an impact on it. As had been referred to by Councillor Gibbons in relation to Ballygawley, the Cathaoirleach had been approached by motorists using the Western Distributor Route stating that they are too high but he felt that they are to be commended.

40. PROVISION OF A HYDROTHERAPY POOL

Proposed by Councillor D. Gilroy
Seconded by Councillor D. Bree

AND AGREED

“To ask Sligo County Council to open negotiations with the HSE and jointly investigate the feasibility of providing a Hydrotherapy pool adjacent to Sligo Regional Sports centre pool.

This service is vital for Children with disabilities from St. Joseph’s Special School, St. Cecilia’s School, Holy Family School, Adults attending Disability Day Services in Cregg, Adults availing of other Residential Services, People attending the Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Centre, and Children with Cerebral Palsy living at home.

These facilities were provided at the Hydrotherapy pool at Cregg House Sligo, and this ceased for no clinical reason due to Covid and we must now accept that this will never be reinstated.

This issue has been raised several times in this chamber, while the most vulnerable and those desperately in need of Hydrotherapy in our society are again being discriminated against.

We could share the technology currently available at the pool and seek capital investment from the HSE and agree a memorandum of understanding on the running of the pool and the costs involved.”

The Cathaoirleach said that both he and Councillor Bree had raised this matter on many occasions. The facility, which had been funded by local contributions and the H.S.E., designed and built by local consultants, architects and contractors had been sold as part of the sale of Cregg House and access to it was no longer an option. The technology was already available on site at Cleveragh in Sligo but he was unsure if there was sufficient space there. A site in Sligo had to be examined and, if not there, possibly located at some of the Healthcare sites. It was his intention, in his role as Cathaoirleach, to call a public meeting of those interested in the project to start again, as had been done approximately 40 years ago.

Councillor Bree said he would gladly second this motion. Members had been informed at their most recent Regional Health Forum West meeting that the reopening of the hydrotherapy pool in Cregg is not economically viable. The H.S.E. is closing out all its arrangements with the former Cregg House campus. Any service user who is clinically identified as requiring the use of the hydrotherapy pool may be facilitated in Our Lady’s Hospital in Manorhamilton. Councillor Bree had been disappointed with the news, given that as the Cathaoirleach had pointed out that the pool was part-funded by the public. Everyone realised that many people require the use of a hydrotherapy pool and he supported the proposal to investigate the possibility of providing a hydrotherapy pool adjacent to the Regional Sports Centre in Cleveragh. He also had a concern about the capacity of the pool in Manorhamilton coping with the number of people that may need to use it in future years.

41. HEDGE CUTTING ALONG ROADSIDES

Proposed by Councillor J. Queenan
Seconded by Councillor M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“To ask the Director of Services to outline when hedge cutting will commence along the National and Regional roads.”

Mr. Molloy had advised the Members that hedge cutting is restricted to the autumn and winter and will commence in October for all areas.

The schedule for verge trimming is as follows

Ballymote-Tubbercurry Municipal District
N17 started 1^st July, 2025 – N4 and N59 to follow
Regional/local roads commenced in Ballymote area on 1^st July, 2025 – Tubbercurry area and Enniscrone area to follow.

Sligo-Drumcliff Municipal District
National Primary N15 – to start in four weeks
Regional/locals to start in three weeks.

Councillor Queenan welcomed the reply from the Director of Services and that verge cutting had commenced. Several members outlined the difficulties encountered when growth affected the roads/sightlines and the Templehouse junction was one location referred to as having benefited from the works carried out there.

43. PROPOSED SURGICAL HUB FOR SLIGO

Proposed by Councillor E. McSharry
Seconded by Councillor A. Higgins

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council writes to the Minister for Health to:

(a) Ask whether she has reviewed the business case for the proposed surgical hub to be located on a greenfield site in Sligo;
(b) Seek confirmation that she has examined the strong evidence and rationale already presented in that business case, which clearly justifies Sligo as the most appropriate location — based on the existing clinical provision of surgical specialties and the strategic geographic location and accessibility of Sligo for the wider North West region;
and (c) Request a clear timeline for when a decision will be made on the approval and funding of the surgical hub for Sligo.”

44. RISE IN HOMELESSNESS

At the request of Councillor O’Boyle, this item was deferred to the agenda for the September Ordinary meeting

“In light of Sligo’s rise in homelessness this council will:
- Officially demand the Housing Minister issue a directive halting no-fault evictions under Section 10 of the Housing Act.
- This council will CPO derelict homes into emergency housing.
- Sligo County Council audit all council-owned land for public housing or modular housing development potential.”

45. THIRD-LEVEL COLLEGE FEES

Proposed by Councillor M. Casserly
Seconded by Councillor M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council expresses its strong opposition to the decision by the Minister for Further and Higher Education, James Lawless, not to continue the reduction in third-level college fees in Budget 2025.

The Council believes this move will disproportionately affect students and families in rural and lower-income areas such as Sligo and the northwest, and in particular those who fall just above the grant threshold — including families with two or more children in full-time third-level education.

We call on the Government to reverse this decision and commit to maintaining and expanding fee reductions to support equal access to higher education.”

46. APARTMENT BLOCKS AT GLOBE HOUSE, CHAPEL HILL

Proposed by Councillor M. Clarke
Seconded by Councillor J. Queenan

AND AGREED

“To call on Sligo County council to provide a report on planning for 64 apartments in 5 blocks at Globe House, Chapel Hill, Sligo. One of the conditions is that the development shall be occupied as per the particulars submitted in the application letter from Michael Gillen CEO of Bridgestock Care Ltd. received on the 16^th November 2021. It shall not be used as alternative residential occupancy or in any other use, unless authorised by prior grant of planning permission. Can the occupancy conditions be outlined and if any alterations have been approved by this authority.”

Ms. Concannon had advised the Members that under Planning reference PL20/445, planning permission was granted for the development of 64 apartments within the grounds of Globe House. The applicant, Bridgestock Care Limited, have provided accommodation and ancillary services for persons seeking International Protection at Globe House since 2004. During the planning application process, the applicant stated that the proposed development of 64 independent living units at Chapel Hill is ‘in anticipation of our contractual relationship continuing with the Department of Children and eventually moving existing residents from Globe House to the new apartments when constructed’.

The Planning Authority has not approved (or being asked to consider) any change to the proposed occupancy of the permitted units since the granting of permission.

Councillor Clarke referred to a proposal to move the residents of Globe House into the apartments highlighted in the notice of motion. While Council Members have voted to end Direct Provision, he said he was aware of the need to provide shelter to those leaving war torn areas. This building was now putting an IPAS (International Protection Accommodation Service) Centre on a permanent footing in Sligo.

To date, €8 billion had been spent in the area caring for migrants, with €1.5 billion spent in the year to date. It appeared to him that the business model is lucrative for private developers to build those IPAS Centres while 1,600 people are on the housing waiting list in Sligo. There are also 80,000 Irish born people, under the age of 50, living in Australia with many people leaving the northwest. There was a question regarding sufficient investment in student accommodation. These lucrative apartments were being developed and yet students and homeless in the northwest were not being looked after.

The clarity received from the Planning Department was welcomed and Councillor Clarke said it was unclear that, once the residents of Globe House were moved into the apartments, what would happen to Globe House and there was concern surrounding this. The suggestion was then made by him that the same business model would be used for student accommodation.

47. COLLOONEY-CLAREMORRIS RAIL LINE

Under item 47 on the agenda, the following item had been listed:

“That Sligo County Council writes to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, and to the Ministers of State in that Department with responsibility for International and Road Transport, Logistics, Rail and Ports, and for Rural Transport, seeking urgent clarification on the status of the Collooney–Claremorris rail line.

The Council notes that as of May 2024, this section was not advanced in the All‑Island Strategic Rail Review. The Council now asks:

Is the Collooney–Claremorris section now included in the current Programme for Government?
Will it be delivered alongside the Athenry–Claremorris line by 2030?
Has it been approved to enter design and planning phase, with an associated timeline and confirmed funding?

This Council strongly supports the immediate reinstatement of this critical rail to Galway. Given its strategic role in regional development, connectivity, decarbonisation and rural sustainability, the exclusion of Sligo portion 47‑mile stretch (75.6 km) of this western rail corridor from State investment cannot be justified.”

The Cathaoirleach advised the meeting that Councillor McSharry wished to amend her motion as follows:

Proposed by Councillor E. McSharry
Seconded by Councillor B. Gallagher

“To change the wording and take out -

Councillor McSharry said her motion sought urgent clarification on the status of the Collooney-Claremorris rail line and outlined the background to listing the motion. A lengthy discussion followed with Members discussing the amending of the resolution. It was then

Proposed by Councillor E. McSharry
Seconded by Councillor B. Gallagher

AND AGREED

The Council notes that as of May 2024, this section was not advanced in the All‑Island Strategic Rail Review. The Council now asks:

Is the Collooney–Claremorris section now included in the current Programme for Government?
Will it be delivered alongside the Athenry–Claremorris line by 2030?
Has it been approved to enter design and planning phase, with an associated timeline and confirmed funding?”

48. DISCOUNTED ELECTRICITY BILLS/FINANCIAL COMPENSATION FOR HOUSEHOLDS

Proposed by Councillor L. Brennan
Seconded by Councillor B. Gallagher

AND AGREED

“I ask that Sligo County Council write to the ESB and the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications, Mr Darragh O'Brien, requesting that consideration be given to offering a discounted electricity bill or other form of financial compensation to households in areas severely affected by Storm Eowyn, where families were left without power for extended periods — in some cases in Co Sligo exceeding two weeks.

In light of the hardship experienced by these communities, and the significant profits reported by the ESB in recent years, it is appropriate that affected customers receive some form of tangible recognition and support in response to the disruption they endured.”

49. STATUTORY COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK FOR EXTENDED ELECTRICITY OUTAGES

Proposed by Councillor L. Brennan
Seconded by Councillor G. Mullaney

AND AGREED

“I ask that Sligo County Council requests the Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU) to review its customer protection standards with a view to introducing a statutory compensation framework for extended electricity outages, similar to the approach taken by Ofgem in the UK, where customers are automatically compensated following storm-related disruptions.”

50. VOTES OF SYMPATHY

Votes of sympathy were recorded.

51. VOTES OF CONGRATULATIONS

Votes of congratulations were recorded.

52. CONFERENCES/TRAINING

Proposed by Councillor P. Taylor
Seconded by Councillor B. Gallagher

AND AGREED

“To approve the Conferences/Training events as circulated.”

53. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS OF CONFERENCES

The summary of proceedings of conferences attended in accordance with Section 142(5)(f) of the Local Government Act, 2001 were noted.

54. CORRESPONDENCE

The Members agreed to note the items of correspondence received.

55. MATTERS ARISING FROM MINUTES

No item was raised under this heading.

56. ANY OTHER BUSINESS

No matter was raised under this heading.

END OF MEETING:

The business of the Meeting concluded at 2.55 p.m.

Meeting Date 07/07/2025