Minutes 2025

Minutes of Statutory Budget Meeting of Sligo County Council held on Monday 17th November 2025 at 10.00 a.m. in The Council Chamber, County Hall, Riverside, Sligo.

COUNCILLORS PRESENT:  

• Councillor Bree,
• Councillor Brennan,
• Councillor Casserly,
• Councillor Clarke,
• Councillor Gallagher,
• Councillor Gibbons,
• Councillor Gilroy,
• Councillor Healy,
• Councillor Higgins,
• Councillor T. MacSharry
• Councillor E. McSharry
• Councillor Mullaney,
• Councillor Mulvey,
• Councillor Nealon,
• Councillor O’Boyle,
• Councillor Queenan
• Councillor Taylor
• Councillor Walsh

 

OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE:

• Mr. Martin Lydon, Chief Executive 
• Ms. Marie Whelan, Head of Finance
• Mr. Brían Flynn, Director of Services
• Mr. Jim Molloy, Director of Services
• Ms. Emer Concannon, Director of Services
• Ms. Patricia Guckian, Financial Accountant
• Ms. Sinéad Branley, Meetings Administrator
• Ms. Karen McMahon, I.S. Technical Support Officer
• Ms. Jo Anne McGonigle, Assistant Staff Officer

 

CATHAOIRLEACH: 

Cathaoirleach, Councillor Dónal Gilroy, presided.  At the outset, he advised the meeting that he would have to leave during the meeting for a short period of time.  This was to attend a brief engagement at Sligo County Library.  He was also awaiting an important telephone call and would have to absent himself from the Chamber should he receive that.  In both instances, the Leas-Cathaoirleach, Councillor Nealon, would take the Chair.

The Cathaoirleach then informed the meeting that he had two motions for consideration at the outset.  Both were duly brought forward for the Members’ consideration and approval.

CONSIDERATION OF BUDGET IN DETAIL:

Proposed by Councillor T. Walsh
Seconded by Councillor B. Gallagher

AND AGREED

“That no further motion be voted on by the Council until such time as the entire budget has been considered in detail”.

PROPOSALS FOR INCREASES OR REDUCTIONS IN EXPENDITURE:

Proposed by Councillor T. Walsh
Seconded by Councillor B. Gallagher

AND AGREED

“That all motions seeking an increase in expenditure or a reduction in income under any heading must either show a corresponding decrease in expenditure or an increase in realisable income.”

DRAFT BUDGET FOR YEAR ENDING 31st DECEMBER, 2026:

The Cathaoirleach invited the Chief Executive to provide an overview of the Budget process.

Mr. Lydon, Chief Executive, outlined the key points contained in his foreword to the draft Budget (pages 2–5 of the document). Members were informed that the Budget had been prepared in accordance with the statutory framework, following consultation with the Corporate Policy Group (CPG) and the Elected Members.

For 2026, the Budget provides revenue funding of €82.6 million, an increase of €1.9 million on the previous year, arising from grants and other sources. In addition, capital expenditure of €151 million is planned. Taken together, this represents a total investment of just under €230 million in County Sligo for 2026.

The National Budget has now been delivered, and a stronger emphasis will be placed on advancing social housing. New targets are expected to be announced before the end of 2025, to which he would return later in the discussions.

The Chief Executive expressed satisfaction in advising Members that Sligo has a robust pipeline of projects. In addition, unlike many other local authorities, Sligo benefits from a substantial land bank, which is a significant advantage.

He noted that the Strategic Workforce Plan is now in place. However, in the context of a highly competitive labour market, Sligo County Council continues to face considerable challenges in recruitment and retention. This difficulty is not unique to Sligo but is experienced across the sector.

It was further highlighted that much of the current funding for Local Government is provided through specific grants—a matter previously discussed. Specific grant funding now represents 44% of all Local Government income, compared with 21% in 2013. Despite this, there has been no real increase in funding levels. In practical terms, with inflation and related pressures not being addressed, both fiscal and operational autonomy have been eroded.

This, he explained, connects directly to the Local Democracy Taskforce established in 2025 by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage. The Taskforce aims to strengthen Local Government in Ireland and is structured around four key pillars: Structures, Finance, Functions, and Governance & Accountability.

Some of the main areas it is going to consider are

• Devolving more decision-making powers to local authorities and Councillors,
• Rebalancing power between Elected Members and the Executive and
• Improving diversity of representation.

Mr. Lydon remarked that the review is both timely and welcome. He noted that Local Government, often described as the “beating heart of our democracy,” must be afforded sufficient autonomy to address the distinct needs of individual counties, as these vary considerably. A uniform approach applied across all counties, he stressed, is not effective.

With regard to income generation, the Chief Executive recalled his 2023 Budget report, in which he had proposed a 10% increase in commercial rates to be implemented over a four-year period up to 2026. This target was reached in 2025, and, as a result of that agreement, the current Budget does not provide for any further rate increases.

The €1.5 million generated annually from this measure has supported projects such as phase one of Sligo Streets and the replacement of public lighting. At present, between 87% and 88% of public lighting has been upgraded to LED bulbs.

As he had referred to earlier, there has been no real increase in funding over the last 13 years, yet the local authority had to maintain service levels.  This was becoming increasingly difficult and unsustainable.  Therefore, he would like to commence a consultation process with Members after this budget process has been finalised to look at annual rate increases from 2027 in line with the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP).  This would link any rate increase to inflation. 

The 2026 revaluation process for the Local Property Tax (LPT) had provided Sligo County Council with an additional €600,000 to its baseline and €96,000 because of the increase in the LPT. 

The Chief Executive continued that it was worth considering that, because of the increase of 15% over the five-year lifetime of this Council, it would generate an additional €4.1 million to be invested in services. 

Members were advised that, following discussions between the Executive and Councillors, suggestions had been made regarding the allocation of these funds. The final decision, however, rested with the Members. Among the proposed new areas of expenditure were the recruitment of a Disability Officer, additional support for the Festival and Events Strategy, and increased funding for public conveniences.

Due to the unwinding of FEMPI and the pay agreements, the local authority received a grant in 2025 of approximately €7.7 million to meet those liabilities. Some time ago, that would have been included in the baseline and the Council would not have to keep applying for a grant to receive that funding.  As it stands, the local authority still has to apply for the funding and it is something that he is encouraging, at a national level, that should be looked at as those costs are not going away. 

The other matter or real importance, and reports will be provided to the Members in 2026, is the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, regarding ‘stranded costs associated with Uisce Éireann.  These are pension costs, central management costs (overheads) e.g. heating and lighting which Uisce Éireann had been paying in the past as part of Sligo County Council providing Water Services.  That MoU will come to an end in 2026.  The Chief Executive emphasised the need for this to be renewed or some other form of funding put in its place.  Otherwise, Sligo County Council will lose €1.2 million overnight which could not afford to do.  This is a sectoral issue and not unique to Sligo. 

In relation to the delivery of capital projects, the Chief Executive said he fully understood the Members’ frustrations with how long these projects take to get off the ground.  The local authority must comply with the Capital Works Management Framework.  If that was not done, funding would not be received.   Despite that, Mr. Lydon said he was pleased to advise the meeting that

• in Q1 of 2026, the first phase of Sligo Streets project would be starting with the contract having been awarded.
• Sligo Harbour Masterplan had been completed, and this gave the local authority an opportunity to see what could be achieved there.
• The tender for the Eastern Garavogue bridge would be published in Q1 of 2026, with construction to commence in Q4 of 2026.
• The design for the THRIVE project (Sligo Gaol and Governor’s House) will also be underway in 2026.
• The tender for Enniscrone cliff bathhouse and promenade project is due to be published in Q2 of 2026
• Construction is due to commence in Q1 of 2026 on facility centres for Water sports activities and
• The tender is to be published for the new Library in Ballymote in Q4 of 2026, looking to start construction in 2027.

These projects will require €17 million in match funding and Members had been alerted to this over the past few years.  These projects are coming to fruition and loan applications will be required.  Financing for the loans is in place due to the rates increases.

In relation to housing, the local authority is in the process of commissioning a report on affordable housing. It is anticipated that there may be a need for such provision in certain parts of Sligo. Should this be confirmed, affordable housing would be considered for development at the Cairnsfoot site (also known as Browne’s Field), Finisklin Phase 2, and Strandhill. These developments would be accompanied by the delivery of social and some private housing, ensuring a balanced social mix across all Council estates.

Ms. Concannon, Director of Services, had recently presented a report to Members, and as outlined therein, there is confidence that the social housing targets will be achieved over the lifetime of the Housing Delivery Action Plan.

There will be a stronger focus on Compulsory Purchase Orders

Details of the National Development Plan (NDP) are eagerly awaited, with an expectation that the N17 would be included and, if so, it would be the largest infrastructure project taking place in Sligo. 

As in 2025, once off funding from development levies was being made available again for footpaths. 

Regarding the delivery of day-to-day services, as a once-off measure funding from development levies will be used to improve access to all beaches.  This would coincide with the recruitment of a disability inclusion officer.  They would work with and enhance the Disability Consultative Committee. 

He proceeded to outline a number of areas of expenditure which had increased in 2026.

In conclusion, the Chief Executive reiterated his view that the Council serves as an enabler in delivering services to the citizens of the county. He emphasised the importance of sustaining and advancing collaboration with Government Departments, State agencies, and local communities, noting that without such partnerships, Sligo County Council cannot fulfil its role, as it cannot operate in isolation.

He expressed sincere appreciation to the Cathaoirleach, Councillor Dónal Gilroy, the Corporate Policy Group (CPG), the Elected Members, and Ms. Marie Whelan together with the Finance team for their support. Acknowledging the significant effort involved in preparing the Budget, the Chief Executive stated that he was pleased to commend it for adoption.

 

PROCEDURE FOR THE MEETING

At this time, the Cathaoirleach sought the Members’ consent to hold their questions for the Senior Management Team until they had all provided their reports. 

The Cathaoirleach then asked Ms. Whelan, Director of Finance for her report.

REPORT FROM DIRECTOR OF FINANCE

Ms. Whelan referred to her report which had been set out on pages 6 to 9 of the draft Budget book.  As Members were aware, the Director of Finance had also set out the information at meetings of the Corporate Policy Group (CPG), Municipal District meetings and with the various party groups. Figures for 2026 in relation to the Local Property Tax (LPT) and the split between the retained locally, equalisation and 15% additional had been set out.  The Chief Executive had also referred to these figures with a baseline additional €600,000 for 2026.  On the Local Property Tax (LPT), the overall total of the 15% increase is €831,908.  The same apportionment had been continued from this sum based on last year when the Members had adopted the 15% increase.  The Members had indicated where they wanted it to allocate, and they had spoken about this at the Municipal District meetings. Details had been provided on page 8 of the book. 

Members were informed that funding of €375,000 had been allocated to address legacy issues relating to the maintenance of Burial Grounds. This allocation derives from the commercial rates increases adopted by the Members in 2023 and 2025, a matter previously discussed at earlier meetings.  It was further noted that, while numerous submissions had been received from Members, available resources are insufficient to meet all requests, leaving several areas without funding.

Other sums highlighted by the Director of Finance were

• €300,000 included for rental income from Housing (going back to Housing maintenance).
• An increase of €645,000 had been included in housing grants.
• The Residential Zoned Land Tax had been included as both an expenditure and an income for 2026. This was because it had to be paid in 2025 but had not been reimbursed yet.  This, however, was the expectation. 
• Planning fees in 2025 are down substantially on the previous year. Therefore, a reduction of €80,000 had to be made to the figure for 2026 to avoid an inflated position. 
• Tourism promotion, social inclusion, cost for Ukrainian support team and integration had increases on both expenditure and income as it is funded.
• The rates increase within the Village and Urban renewal.
• Burial grounds referred to earlier is in E09.
• Dereliction is from the money from the Local Property Tax (LPT)
• Water Safety has additional funding for the training of Lifeguards.
• Fire Services was showing a reduction, but it is more accurate. Pay costs had been estimated that were higher than necessary so this had been reduced.  Additionally, the pay from the pay agreements is funded. 
• Leisure Facilities Operations included a sum of €50,000 for Waterpoint Enniscrone, as had also been referred to in the Chief Executive’s report.
• Library books have continued increased funding of €75,000.
• Open spaces had additional funding of €70,000 for the Rural Municipal District Engineering areas. This was coming from the additional funds from the Local Property Tax (LPT).
• In F0502 Contributions to Arts has reduced by €30,000 with that amount moving to F0505 and, at the same time, an increase in Arts Contributions of €20,000. All funding has now been moved into F0505 for Festivals.  This has the €30,000 from Arts along with €30,000 from the additional Local Property Tax (LPT) and a further increase of €50,000 giving a total of €110,000.
• F06 has the cost of a Disability Inclusion Officer.
• The operation of Sligo Harbour contract had increased in 2025, following a tender process. This was, therefore, showing an increase in G0203.
• The Veterinary service is removed from the budget for 2026. It had been expected to go in 2025 but, due to uncertainty as to when it would move, it had been retained in the 2025 budget.
• As had been referred to in the Chief Executive’s report, the Register of Electors has an increase of operational costs and salaries. Salaries are funded for the work on ‘Voter.ie’.
• Overall, the budget has increased but it also had reductions in Division C (Water Services) of approximately €1.2 million, together with the Veterinary Service. It was evident that Water Services is reducing all the time as several staff have moved to Uisce Éireann.  23 staff remain on the operational side in Water Services, so they were still budgeted for with income corresponding.  There had been a significant reduction in Water Services in recent years, and the biggest reduction is for 2026. 
• Rates are remaining as it was for 2025 at .2536.

This information concluded the Director of Finance’s overall update.

 

REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL ALLOCATION

Councillor Bree sought consent from the Cathaoirleach to respond to the introductory remarks from the Chief Executive and the Director of Finance and said that he wished to submit a motion before the meeting. 

The Cathaoirleach referred to the resolution previously passed that no motions would be taken until the conclusion of the meeting. Councillor Bree, however, noted that the agreement had been that no motions would be voted upon until the end.  Councillor Bree went on to state that both the Chief Executive and the Director of Finance, in their introductory remarks, had outlined the Council’s financial position. He observed that, while Local Government funding had increased by 23% over the past 13 years, inflation during the same period had risen by 21.5%. In real terms, therefore, funding levels had not meaningfully improved.  He further argued that this situation had significantly diminished the role and authority of Elected Representatives, weakening and undermining the local government system, which he considered unsustainable in the long term.  After presenting additional points and supporting statistics, Councillor Bree concluded by expressing his view that Sligo should pursue additional funding to enable the Council to address the many challenges it faces as a lagging region.

It was then

Proposed by Councillor D. Bree
Seconded by Councillor G. O’Boyle

“Noting the legacy of underinvestment in Sligo and the Northern and Western Region, this Council calls on the government to provide an additional financial allocation to this and the other Councils in the region to assist us in maintaining and improving services and in addressing the many challenges we face as a ‘lagging region’.”

Councillor Bree then asked that when it came time to vote on the resolutions that they would support this motion.

The Cathaoirleach then asked any other Members to refrain from submitting further motions until all the Directors had given their reports.

 

LIVE, INVEST, VISIT

Mr. Flynn said that, as Director for Live, Invest, Visit, his focus would be on the following parts of the Budget book for 2026. 

• Division A – Housing (including maintenance and improvements to local authority housing, estate management, housing assessments rents and tenant purchase, energy retrofitting, housing grants and homeless services).

(Director of Services, Ms. Emer Concannon, would speak to Housing capital matters, he advised the meeting).

• Division D05 Tourism promotion and development
• Division D06 Community and Enterprise
• Division D09 Economic Development and Promotion
• F02 and F05 relating to Library and Arts Services.

Key Highlights – Division A (Housing)

As outlined by the Director of Finance, the Housing budget includes an increase of €200,000 for general local authority housing maintenance and €100,000 for planned maintenance. This will be funded through an overall rise in rental income of approximately €300,000, comprising €200,000 from the proposed rent review and €100,000 from improved collection figures. Members had previously been advised of the intention to conduct a rent review and update the differential rent scheme in early 2026, the current scheme having been in place since 2020. The objective is to deliver a fair system whereby all tenants contribute a reasonable rent based on an appropriate assessment of earnings and income.

As in previous years, the Council continues to face significant challenges in addressing homelessness. Particular emphasis is being placed on reducing long-term family homelessness and lowering the numbers in emergency accommodation through allocations to Council and Approved Housing Body (AHB) properties. The 2026 budget reflects these priorities.

Regarding Housing Adaptation Grants for older people and persons with disabilities, Mr. Flynn noted the increasing demand for the scheme. Following a record allocation from the Department in 2025, the aim for 2026 is again to secure substantial funding to enable necessary home improvements. The budget provides match funding of approximately €450,000 to support this objective.

Division D

Division D05 – Tourism Promotion

Expenditure will remain broadly in line with 2025, following significant increases in recent years. This funding supports a dedicated Tourism team to promote Sligo nationally and internationally, working with stakeholders to implement the Destination Experience Development Plan. Continued investment in brand awareness and content development for the Visit Sligo website and portal is included. The budget also provides ongoing support for Ireland West Airport, Sligo Airport, the National Surf Centre, and Queen Maeve Square.

Division D06 – Community and Enterprise

Funding levels remain similar to 2025, with one notable enhancement: provision for the appointment of a Disability Inclusion Officer. This role will support the Community team in administering the Disability Consultative Committee and delivering actions under the Disability and Inclusion Strategy.

Community priorities include the continued implementation of programmes such as Sligo Age Friendly and Sligo Healthy Ireland, support for the LCDC in fulfilling its functions, and ongoing delivery of LEADER and SICAP programmes in partnership with the LAG, LCDC, and Sligo Leader Partnership. The €3.6 million PEACEPLUS Local Action Plan will also be advanced.

In 2026, the local Community Safety Partnership will be rolled out, and following the re-establishment of the Disability Consultative Committee, work will progress on implementing the Disability Inclusion and Access Strategy.

On integration, Sligo County Council will remain the central point of support for beneficiaries of temporary protection, international protection applicants, and refugees arriving in Sligo. The Council will continue to lead and support the Community Integration Forum and the Sligo Intercultural Network to ensure effective collaboration and coordination of local services.

Division D09 Economic Development and Promotion

Budgets for 2026 will remain consistent with 2025. Key deliverables include implementation of the Local Enterprise Plan, delivery of EU and cross-border programmes, and advancement of the Atlantic Economic Corridor Plan. Flagship projects such as AIM and Socolab will be promoted and developed, alongside management of the Economic Forum.

Division F

Divisions F02 and F05 – Library and Arts Services

Funding remains broadly in line with 2025, with increases directed towards salary costs. Mr. Flynn confirmed that the library book fund for 2026 will remain at €175,000, ensuring delivery of national programmes such as Right to Read and Skills for Life, while maintaining an up-to-date stock for schools, local studies, and general services.

Arts allocations will increase by €20,000, directed towards Arts grants currently advertised for 2026. This will strengthen support for Arts infrastructure, festivals, and events across County Sligo, with particular emphasis on new initiatives.

 

ROADS, TRANSPORTATION AND SAFETY

Mr. Molloy, Director of Services, said he would start with Division B and details were set out on pages 43 to 52 of the budget book (tables on pages 50 to 52).  The key issues identified by Mr. Molloy were as follows.

A small increase in the overall budget for Roads from €24.6 to €25.1 million.  €6 million of this sum would be spent on National Primary roads under Director of Services, Ms. Concannon.  €14 million would be set aside for maintenance and improvement of Regional and Local roads. 

Active travel was expected to come in at around €3 million, as in previous years, with an additional €500,000 being made available for the bus stop enhancement programme.  This programme was expected to get on the ground as Sligo County Council has taken control of it from the N.T.A.

Other key projects within this Department are the Eastern Garavogue Bridge, which the Chief Executive had mentioned earlier.  This was expected to go to construction in Q4 of 2026. 

Funding had also been sought for the R293 in Gurteen and the First Sea Road schemes. 

The meeting was informed that discussions had recently taken place with the N.T.A. regarding the Collooney–Castlebaldwin scheme, which remains pending approval. The matter is currently under consideration by the Authority, and once their budget position has been confirmed, they will advise Sligo County Council whether the project has been approved to proceed to construction stage. It is anticipated that progress on the scheme could commence in early 2026.

The scheme at Burton Street is currently underway.  Good progress was expected, with the scheme to be completed in the programme time. 

In relation to Division E - Environmental Services - on pages 73 to 83 (with tables on pages 81 to 83), the budget was much the same as last year at around the €10.4 million mark. 

Funding for Cemeteries has increased significantly, rising from €456,000 to €891,000. As noted by the Director of Finance, much of this allocation will be directed towards continuing works initiated in 2025 to bring existing cemeteries up to standard. Consideration will also be given to projects aimed at increasing capacity. Substantial work remains to be undertaken, both to expand cemetery provision across the county and to ensure that operational cemeteries are properly maintained. Options include acquiring land to extend existing cemeteries or, where necessary, securing new sites for additional facilities.

Progress also continues on the Strandhill and Easkey coastal erosion schemes. Engagement is ongoing with the Department and the Office of Public Works (OPW) to accelerate these projects, with the aim of commencing construction in 2026. Advancement remains subject to planning requirements and associated approvals.

 

DIVISION F – RECREATION AND AMENITY

Mr. Molloy drew the Members’ attention to pages 85 to 92 (with tables on pages 91 and 92) of their budget book.

The budget in this area has increased by approximately €500,000, rising from €6.4 million to €6.9 million. This primarily relates to Divisions F03 and F04, covering leisure and recreation amenities, which show a modest increase. Included within this is the €75,000 referenced by the Director of Finance, allocated to the expansion of Parks’ facilities, particularly outside the Borough area.

There is an ongoing objective to extend Parks Department coverage across the entire county. However, further work is required to bring the team to full capacity in order to achieve this.

Finally, Mr. Molloy advised the Members that funding was being sought for the Cleveragh improvements following the recent Part 8.  Work would continue to get that done. 

In relation to beach facilities, Mr. Molloy advised the meeting that there would be a focus on that in 2026 e.g. toilet facilities, beach access but also on the lifeguard system with work having commenced on providing training courses for lifeguards in2026.

In concluding, Mr. Molloy advised the meeting that those were the key items from his Directorate.

 

CLARIFICATION ON MEMBERS’ OPPORTUNITY TO RAISE QUERIES ON REPORTS

Councillor Bree sought clarification from the Cathaoirleach regarding the intended structure of the meeting. He noted that a report had been delivered by Mr. Flynn on Housing and Building, and proceedings had since moved on to a different Programme.

In response, the Cathaoirleach explained that one further report was to be presented by the Director of Services, Ms. Concannon. Following that, Members would have the opportunity to put questions to the Chief Executive or any of the Directors, seek clarification, or propose amendments.

PROGRAMME GROUP A – HOUSING CAPITAL

Ms. Concannon returned to Programme group A (Housing Capital), as had been indicated by Director of Services, Mr. Flynn.  As the Chief Executive had advised the Members, 2026 is the last year of the Housing Delivery Action Plan.  97% of that target would be achieved with the remaining percentage being delivered in 2027.

In 2026, ten housing schemes will be on site at various stages of delivery. Sligo has embraced modern methods of construction, enabling accelerated progress; six of the ten schemes will be delivered using these approaches.

Following the recent publication of the Housing Action Plan, a new Housing Delivery Action Plan for Sligo will be prepared. Work will be undertaken with the Department to establish targets to 2030, based on identified needs across the county.

As outlined by the Chief Executive, several pipeline projects will continue to utilise design-and-build and modern construction methods. Competitive dialogue will also be employed for mixed-tenure developments, with such an approach currently underway at the Cairnsfoot site in Sligo.

The Council is also assessing demand for affordable housing in Sligo and Strandhill. Where demand is confirmed, affordable housing will be developed alongside social housing within schemes at these locations, ensuring a balanced mix.

Under the Sligo East City Cranmore and Environs Masterplan, the principal focus for 2026 will be advancing the delivery of the Community Resource and Recreation Centre.

PROGRAMME GROUP D – DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT

Ms. Concannon referred to the new Planning and Development Act, which is being enacted in stages, with accompanying regulations to follow. These changes will impact both local and national processes throughout 2026.

In terms of forward planning, priority will be given to the Urban Area Plan for Sligo and Environs, which is scheduled for public consultation in mid-2026. A landscape characterisation assessment will also be prepared for County Sligo, as required under the County Development Plan, and this will further support the UNESCO World Heritage site bid. In addition, Sligo County Council will progress and finalise the Variation to the County Development Plan, as directed by the Minister.

 

PROGRAMME GROUP D – CAPITAL DELIVERY TEAM

The programme includes Town Centre First, which will remain a key priority in 2026, as also highlighted in the new Housing Action Plan. Tubbercurry already has an established Town Team, and work is currently underway to establish similar teams in Ballymote, Ballisodare, Collooney, and Enniscrone. For these towns, tailored plans will be developed with the objective of delivering community-led capital projects. A particular emphasis will be placed on regenerating vacant and derelict buildings.

To support these initiatives, the Council will utilise available funding mechanisms, including the Rural Regeneration and Development Fund (RRDF) and the Town and Village Renewal Scheme, to finance the community-led projects identified in the town plans.

Several key projects currently in development are detailed in the Budget Book and were highlighted by the Chief Executive. These are listed in Appendix 2 – Three-Year Capital Programme 2026–2028 (page 108).

Addressing vacancy and dereliction will be a key priority in 2026. The recently published Housing Action Plan has highlighted the importance of tackling these issues. The vacant property refurbishment grant scheme, which has already proven successful in Sligo, will be expanded to include initiatives such as an “over the shop” scheme, with implementation planned for 2026. This is expected to have a positive impact on towns and villages across the county.

Members were reminded that property owners who fail to engage with the Council to bring derelict sites back into use are, and will continue to be, placed on the Derelict Sites Register. Compulsory Purchase Orders for derelict sites will also form a central part of the Council’s work programme in 2026.

On Heritage and Biodiversity, the Council will continue to implement the Sligo Heritage Strategy and the County Sligo Biodiversity Action Plan. In relation to the UNESCO World Heritage bid, Ms. Concannon confirmed that work will continue in 2026 to advance the nomination dossier for this application.

LAND ASSETS AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

This team is responsible for managing all of Sligo County Council’s buildings and land assets, including maintenance and cleaning contracts, leases, disposals, and acquisitions.

A key priority for 2026 will be advancing the design of new office accommodation for staff. Consideration is being given to the footprint of the current Road Design office, formerly the Teagasc building, with the objective of providing sufficient accommodation for all Council staff and thereby eliminating the need to lease external office space.

The team also oversees the Harbour, with port operations outsourced but managed under the supervision of the Council’s own staff. Reference was made to the Sligo Harbour Masterplan, which will facilitate the strategic redevelopment of the Ballast Quay Harbour area. This project will form part of the Sligo Urban Area Plan, scheduled for public consultation in mid-2026.

Ms. Concannon also highlighted the THRIVE project for Sligo Gaol, a Town Centre First Heritage Revival Scheme described as a potential game changer for this part of Sligo. The scheme will progress to design stage in 2026.

Two further urban regeneration projects were noted for 2026: the Sligo City Public Realm Enhancement project (commonly referred to as the Sligo Streets project) and the City Campus project. Both form part of the wider Masterplan, which is currently in preparation and expected to be completed by mid-2026.

DIVISION B

Finally, Ms. Concannon returned to Division B and National Road improvement works.  This includes all the projects managed by the Sligo Regional Design Office.  All of their projects are 100% funded by T.I.I. and the Department of Transport.  All those projects are listed in the three-year Capital programme. 

Key projects were identified as the N17 Knock to Collooney.  This continues to be a priority for Sligo County Council and would be progressed through design and environmental evaluation in 2026. 

The N16 Sligo to Drumkilsellagh to go from Sligo to the newly constructed scheme will be progressed in 2026. 

Two pavements’ schemes are expected to be on the ground in 2026, i.e. on the N16 towards the county boundary and on the N59 at Tullylinn.

Safety schemes are being progressed in 2026, together with greenways and Active travel schemes.  Again, those details had been set out in the Capital plan and the Members had an opportunity to examine all the projects being progressed in all of the areas at the back of their budget books.

 

QUERIES FROM ELECTED MEMBERS

The Cathaoirleach then invited Elected Members to raise any queries.

Councillor Clarke began by expressing his thanks to the Executive, the Chief Executive, and the Directors of Services for their approach to preparing the 2026 Budget Book, noting their constructive engagement with Members. While he did not have major objections to the budget, he outlined several areas of concern.

His first point related to the Lugnadiffa section of the N59 route. Although a safety scheme exists for this location, the high number of road traffic accidents there was highlighted. In his view, given the serious consequences of these incidents, the stretch should be brought back into planning. He noted that significant work had already been undertaken in Road Design and route selection, with landowner cooperation secured, making the project effectively “shovel ready.”

Councillor Clarke further observed that while the N17 scheme is scheduled to progress in 2027, it would be 2030 at the earliest before works commence. He welcomed the planned upgrade of the section at Tullylinn, describing the completed portion as a success, notwithstanding a small section that had subsided and required repair. He acknowledged the cooperation of local Engineers throughout the year, who had worked closely with Members to address required works.

Turning to housing, he welcomed the additional €200,000 allocation for maintenance and repairs, stressing its importance given the aging housing stock. He also strongly supported the inclusion of €450,000 in match funding for Older Persons’ Grants, which enable people to remain in their homes. He expressed concern at the temporary closure of the scheme during the year and the suspension of applications and hoped that those contacted by the Council to resubmit applications would be prioritised when the programme reopens in 2026.

In conclusion, Councillor Clarke extended his thanks to all Housing staff for their cooperation. He confirmed his intention to support the budget and Councillor Bree’s resolution on funding. He also referred to his recent participation in a delegation to northern Spain, a region of similar size and population. Unlike the north-western assembly area, which received €300 million in European funding, that region—classified as in transition rather than lagging—had secured €700 million.

Councillor Walsh expressed his appreciation to the Directors of Services for their work on the report, with particular thanks to Ms. Whelan for preparing the Budget Book. He welcomed the increase in spending of €1.9 million for 2026, bringing the overall budget to €82.6 million. He noted that many communities across towns and villages may not fully realise the scale of services delivered by the local authority, which represents a substantial and ongoing body of work. He emphasised that there are many positive developments in the county at present, particularly on the capital side, and that these should be acknowledged.

Referring to the Chief Executive’s comments on the slow pace of progress, Councillor Walsh remarked that delays in advancing capital projects are a source of frustration not only for communities but also for the Council itself. He highlighted the significant level of red tape involved in procurement, the capital works management framework, active travel schemes, and low-cost safety schemes, all of which contribute to slow delivery. While announcements may be made, the time taken to move from allocation to project completion remains excessive. He stressed that this is a national-level issue within the Department and is evident across multiple sectors, including the H.S.E. and other agencies.

Councillor Walsh also welcomed the increase in funding for local authority housing maintenance, as referenced by Councillor Clarke. He noted that Members regularly receive numerous representations on this issue and, while the additional allocation would be of assistance, it was clear that it would not be sufficient to meet overall demand.

Referring to the Chief Executive’s comments on the procurement of a report into affordable housing, with three sites identified, Councillor Walsh expressed uncertainty as to why such a report was being commissioned and questioned its necessity.

He acknowledged the remarks made regarding the strengthening of the Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) process, which he felt was a positive development, particularly in addressing problematic properties that can negatively affect areas such as town centres.

Councillor Walsh further welcomed the increase of approximately €100,000 in tourism funding. He highlighted the significant progress achieved since the appointment of Aisling Quinn (Festival Events Co-ordinator) and Aidan McCormack (Tourism Officer), noting that the promotion of the county through the Sligo and Visit Sligo pages had reached a new level. In particular, he commended the enhanced marketing of events and weekly activities taking place across the county.

Councillor Walsh referred to the DEDP launched in previous years, noting that it had outlined several projects proposed for 2026. He sought clarification as to whether these related to capital projects, such as those at Rosses Point and Enniscrone.

He welcomed the €30,000 increase for the Festivals and Events allocation, acknowledging the Director’s role in securing this funding. He described it as a significant gain for a sector that had been underfunded for the past decade, with inflation and rising costs not adequately addressed. From the total allocation of €110,000 for Tier 1 and Tier 2 of the Festivals and Events Strategy, he expressed the hope that the majority of funding would be directed towards the events themselves, thereby enhancing their quality.

On the matter of a Christmas Market, Councillor Walsh highlighted the success of the new indoor market at The Canopy, which currently has 80 vendors on a waiting list. He expressed his hope that this initiative was being scoped, as he intended to raise the issue again in 2026.

Councillor Walsh also emphasised the importance of delivering bus shelters across the county in 2026. He noted that this was the third year in which €500,000 had been included for the project and welcomed that responsibility had returned to the local authority. He expressed the hope that the shelters would finally be completed in 2026.

He described the Eastern Garavogue Bridge as a critical piece of infrastructure. While acknowledging that some concerns raised were genuine, he stressed the need for the project to proceed in order to support town centre development. He expressed the hope that the timeline for construction commencement in Q4 2026 would be adhered to.

Referring to Mr. Molloy’s comments on the recent meeting with the N.T.A., Councillor Walsh said it would be disappointing if funding for active travel remained at €3 million without any increase. He noted that several schemes, including Coolaney, Ballygawley, and Ballinode, were at “shovel-ready” stage, with seven projects in total prepared for delivery after three years of development.

He welcomed the proposed expansion of the Parks Department, with funding extended to cover the wider county. In relation to the Sligo Harbour Masterplan, he asked whether funding had been included in the budget to advance the plan to its next stage.

Finally, Councillor Walsh noted that the long-delayed Sligo Streets project, which had been held up for many years by red tape, is scheduled to commence in 2026. He concluded by thanking staff for their work, acknowledging the many positives within the project, and expressing the Members’ anticipation of its delivery in 2026.

 

QUERIES FROM ELECTED MEMBERS

The Cathaoirleach informed the meeting that he would next invite Councillor Casserly to raise queries or make comments. He indicated his intention to ask the Executive to respond to the points raised before resuming questions from Members in groups of three.

Councillor Casserly expressed agreement with many of the points already made by her colleagues, noting that several of the issues she wished to raise had been addressed. She extended her thanks to the Directors of Services, departmental staff, and outdoor staff, acknowledging their commitment and willingness to assist, often outside of regular hours.

She endorsed the remarks made by Councillor Walsh regarding the tourism development team, highlighting the success of the new portal which now integrates information across the county. She commended the model developed in partnership with the A.T.U., stating that it deserved significant credit.

Councillor Casserly then queried the timeline for the Rosses Point community boat park and the progression of Active Travel programmes. She observed that the criteria applied to smaller projects in Sligo appear to mirror those used for larger projects, with the same processes and procedures, which in her view slows delivery. She requested that this concern be conveyed to the Department, T.I.I., and those responsible for developing project phases, stressing the need for a different model to be applied to smaller Active Travel projects in villages. She noted that the consultation process, as it currently stands, is taking far too long.

Reference was made to the public toilets at Rosses Point and Mullaghmore. Councillor Casserly stressed that this issue must remain on the agenda at every opportunity, with funding sought to ensure they are kept open. While many projects compete for resources, she emphasised that this matter is vital and regularly raised at Municipal District meetings.

Councillor Casserly also referred to the demand for social housing, as highlighted by Councillor Walsh and Ms. Concannon, Director of Services. Members are acutely aware of this demand, receiving frequent representations from the public. She asked, once the report confirming the need is received, how long the process would take before action is implemented and houses are built or developed.

She described the “over the shop” scheme as an excellent initiative, regretting that it had not been introduced years earlier.

Councillor Casserly welcomed the confirmation that Compulsory Purchase Orders will be pursued for derelict sites, and she praised the THRIVE project for Sligo Gaol, which she regarded as transformative. She paid tribute to all those involved in progressing the scheme.

 

RESPONSES TO QUERIES FROM COUNCILLORS CLARKE, WALSH AND CASSERLY:

The Cathaoirleach requested that the Executive respond to the queries raised by Members, noting that while many statements had been made, there were also specific questions requiring clarification.

The Chief Executive began by addressing the issue of local authority housing. He recalled that during the period when Sligo County Council was operating under the Financial Plan, only €100 per house had been available for maintenance. By contrast, according to the N.O.A.C. indicators for 2024, this figure now stands at €1,480 per house, the highest among all Level 5 local authorities. Mr. Lydon confirmed that significant investment is being made in this area and that the additional allocation will further strengthen the Council’s capacity to deliver improvements.

In relation to Affordable Housing, the Chief Executive advised that an evidence-based approach was required to demonstrate why Sligo should qualify for such provision. For this reason, the local authority had engaged an Economist to prepare a report which could then be submitted to the Department. He explained that it was not sufficient to simply state that housing costs in parts of Sligo were high; robust evidence was needed. The Executive expressed confidence that this evidence would be forthcoming, enabling progress once the report was completed.

Regarding the Sligo Harbour Masterplan, the Chief Executive noted that no funding was currently available to advance the plan to the next stage. This had necessitated the need to establish a Designated Activity Company (D.A.C.), with Council representation, to explore delivery options. He recalled previous references to similar models in Limerick and Kilkenny, where private financiers had been engaged. He emphasised that substantial private investment would be required to deliver the Masterplan and, as one of the largest landholders in the area, Sligo County Council must play a central role in the company.

Ms. Concannon, in addressing the Affordable Housing assessment, confirmed that it was expected to be completed by the end of January 2026. She advised that engagement with the Department was already underway and assured Members that there would be no delay in progressing delivery.

QUERIES FROM COUNCILLORS T. MACSHARRY, MULLANEY AND TAYLOR

Councillor T. MacSharry expressed his gratitude to the Chief Executive, the Management Team, Mr. Joe Murphy, and all staff, both on behalf of the Members and the people of Sligo. He remarked that the county is well served by diligent and dedicated staff within the local authority.

Reflecting on the challenges faced in 2014, as referenced by the Chief Executive, Councillor MacSharry recalled the difficult circumstances of that period. He acknowledged the significant progress made since then and commended all those involved in bringing the authority to its current positive position.

He welcomed the announcement regarding the E2 project, describing it as a vital and much-needed piece of infrastructure, and looked forward to its advancement.

Councillor MacSharry also noted the positive decision to freeze commercial rates. While businesses in Sligo appear to be performing well, he encouraged people to shop locally to give retailers the best opportunity during the Christmas period. He emphasised that the Council is playing its part by freezing rates for a year, at a time when the cost of doing business has never been higher.

On housing, he welcomed the increased allocation for maintenance but urged that the Government should consider “front-loading” grants, particularly those for elderly people.

He further expressed support for any initiative to establish a Christmas market in 2026, stressing that the business community should be actively involved in its development.

In conclusion, Councillor MacSharry raised one query regarding the Strandhill Public Realm, asking whether there had been any progress in terms of funding. He confirmed his support for the budget and reiterated his appreciation for the hard work of staff.

Councillor Mullaney extended his compliments to the Chief Executive, the Directors of Services, and their teams for their work on the budget and throughout the year. He gave particular recognition to the outdoor staff, noting the increasing pressures they face as a result of climate change.

Reflecting on his time as a Councillor between 2004 and 2014, he recalled the Council’s difficult financial position between 2009 and 2014. As referenced by Councillor MacSharry, he acknowledged that Sligo County Council is now in a strong financial position. He stated that the figures presented were ones that could be stood over with confidence.

Councillor Mullaney then addressed specific elements of the budget. He welcomed the allocation of €1.2 million for retrofitting local authority houses and sought an estimate of how many homes this funding would cover. He described the initiative as positive, funded directly by the Department, bringing houses to a high standard and reducing costs for tenants.

He also welcomed the increase in housing maintenance funding from €2.4 million to €2.7 million, describing it as a decent improvement, though still only a fraction of what is required given the aging housing stock and associated infrastructure such as footpaths and fencing.

The allocation for Housing Adaptation Grants was similarly welcomed, though he agreed with Councillor Clarke that further funding is needed. He regretted the closure of the scheme during the year, noting its importance in enabling people to remain in their homes and communities with dignity.

Councillor Mullaney expressed satisfaction that the long-standing snag list on the N4 (Cloonamahon to Castlebaldwin) will be resolved in 2026. He noted that the issue was not of the Council’s making but had arisen from the collapse of the road construction company and stressed the urgency of addressing it.

He highlighted the Community Improvement Schemes, which received an allocation of €470,000. While acknowledging the scheme’s success, he pointed out that applications far exceed available funding, estimating that €4–€5 million would be required to meet demand. He emphasised the need for continued lobbying to secure additional resources.

Finally, he welcomed the commitment to complete housing units in Camross, Ballymote by Q4 2026. He described this as a positive development for Ballymote and for those on the housing list, noting the progress made and again thanking all involved in preparing the budget.

Councillor Taylor expressed his thanks to the Chief Executive and all staff, both indoor and outdoor. Echoing the remarks of Councillor T. MacSharry, he noted that this was an appropriate occasion to acknowledge their efforts.

He also extended compliments to his fellow Councillors, recognising that they are often required to make difficult and sometimes unpopular decisions. He commended them for doing so, stating that such decisions have contributed to the Council’s current position.

While confirming his support for the budget, Councillor Taylor voiced concerns regarding his Municipal District. In reviewing the capital programme and the projects outlined in the Budget Book, he acknowledged that many initiatives must be town-based, as Sligo town must thrive for the county to thrive. However, he observed that no Active Travel schemes and only limited low-cost accident schemes were being directed to his area.

He noted that funding for housing maintenance would be distributed county-wide, but highlighted that, in the case of Community and Voluntary grants or Arts grants, only two south-based Arts grants were allocated in 2025. He questioned whether funding should be rebalanced to better support communities and committees in the south of the county. While larger populated areas such as Sligo town benefit from more block grants, he stressed that bus shelters are urgently required and several bridges in his Municipal District have long needed repairs. He asked what steps were necessary to secure funding for these works.

In conclusion, Councillor Taylor emphasised the importance of investment in towns and villages across the county. He expressed concern at the lack of rural-based projects and reiterated the need for greater attention to these areas.

DIRECTORS’ RESPONSES TO QUERIES

Mr. Flynn referred to Councillor Mullaney’s enquiry regarding retrofitting.  It is currently costing approximately €34,000 to €35,000. Funds would allow for works on 37-38 units in 2026.

In relation to funding for the Strandhill Public Realm, Ms. Concannon advised the meeting that planning was approved in July 2025.  Sligo County Council is now awaiting the opportunity for a fund to open and apply for the works at that location.  There has not been any call nationally for any funding under the R.R.D.F. Category 1 (Construction).  Once that opportunity arises, the Council will apply. 

QUERIES FROM COUNCILLORS MULVEY, NEALON AND BREE

At the outset of his remarks, Councillor Mulvey stated that he wished to join previous speakers in thanking the Executive and Directors of Services for their work on the budget. He also extended his appreciation to the outdoor staff, noting that gritters had been in operation the previous night and emphasising the vital work they carry out in all conditions while residents remain safe in their homes.

He confirmed his intention to support the budget, as he has consistently done, while acknowledging that resources will never be sufficient to meet every demand.

Councillor Mulvey welcomed the increase in funding for cemeteries and expressed the hope that this would allow progress on cemetery walls and sites that have lacked investment for many years.

On public lighting and retrofitting, he asked that the local authority again consider the use of solar-powered lighting in public areas. While installation costs would be involved, he noted that ongoing expenses would be minimal and that such systems are already in widespread use, making them worthy of investigation.

Councillor Mulvey welcomed progress on Active Travel projects and recalled works identified in the past. He argued that, as with bus shelters and footpaths, funding should be allocated directly to Area Engineers, which would have ensured completion of projects by now.

He also expressed caution regarding the establishment of town teams. While supportive of future development, he hoped they would not undermine or duplicate the work of existing community groups. He cited Ballymote Community Council as an example of a group that identified local needs, worked with Sligo County Council and Sligo LEADER Partnership, and successfully delivered on its priorities. He stressed the importance of ensuring that such groups are not diminished or subordinated to town teams.

Finally, Councillor Mulvey raised the issue of planned maintenance of local authority housing stock. He noted the frustration expressed by tenants who are waiting for planned works while funds are being directed towards void properties.

Councillor Nealon joined colleagues in extending thanks to the Executive for their work in preparing the budget and welcomed what he described as the positive news of a €1.9 million increase.

He noted the strong housing pipeline, with 95% of houses in the delivery programme expected to be completed in 2026, and commended the work of the Housing Section, particularly Mr. Joe Murphy and his team.

Referring to earlier discussions, Councillor Nealon raised concerns about recruitment and retention of staff, especially within the Engineering area, and asked whether plans were in place to address this issue.

He highlighted car parking as a recurring matter at Municipal District meetings. From the budget book, he observed that expenditure on car parks amounted to €593,000, while income was €1.4 million, generating a surplus of €800,000. In his view, this justified the provision of additional parking spaces, and he urged a proactive approach, including engagement with private stakeholders, to pursue the development of a multi-storey car park in the town centre.

Councillor Nealon considered the allocation of €20,000 for playgrounds to be insufficient. He paid tribute to Mr. Micheál Condren of the Parks Department for his dedicated work in this area.

Finally, he noted that town teams were to be established in Ballymote, Ballisodare, Collooney, and Enniscrone, but Strandhill was not included. He emphasised that Strandhill is the fastest-growing town in Sligo and is set to surpass Tubbercurry in population, becoming the county’s second-largest town. He identified priority areas requiring attention there, including a Masterplan, improvements to the top road, and the development of a tidal pool.

Councillor Bree informed the meeting that he wished to comment on three programmes.

At the outset, he associated himself with the remarks of colleagues in thanking the Council’s management and staff, not only for producing the draft budget but also for their work throughout the past year.

He reiterated that specific grants now account for 44% of overall funding. Once salaries and pensions are provided for, the Council is left with very limited discretion in framing and adopting a budget. In his view, this highlights the need for significant reform of the local government system.

Referring to the documentation and reports received, Councillor Bree noted that the Housing Adaptation Grant anticipates an allocation of €703,000 in 2026 to fund works and extensions for elderly and disabled tenants. Given the volume of applications already submitted, he questioned whether this level of funding would be sufficient.

On housing more broadly, he addressed the local authority home loans scheme, a government-backed mortgage for first-time buyers. In Sligo, the maximum market value of a property eligible under the scheme is €275,000. Members had been advised that three loans had been approved in principle to date, and he sought clarification on how many loans had been approved in 2024 and 2025. He described the scheme as a failure, arguing that people in urgent need of housing are receiving no meaningful support. He criticised the lack of funding, excessive bureaucracy, and unaffordable property prices, stating that the scheme is unworkable and only adds to the frustration of couples and families striving to purchase their own homes.

Turning to Division B – Greenways and National Road Active Travel – Councillor Bree noted that documentation indicated the proposed Collooney to Bellaghy greenway is scheduled to progress to phase 3 (Design and Environmental Evaluation) in 2026. He asked when this evaluation would be completed and when the preferred route would be determined. He emphasised that greenways encourage walking and cycling and that there is strong public demand for progress. He stressed that investment must deliver maximum benefit to the area and ensure the greenway’s permanence once developed. He welcomed the willingness of Iarnród Éireann to co-operate with the Council in exploring a route at a safe distance from the Western Rail Corridor, stating that their support deserves recognition. He urged that consultants complete their work promptly and that pressure be maintained on the Government to secure the necessary funding for the project.

Finally, in relation to Programme F – Operation of the Arts Service – Councillor Bree highlighted the value of the Service in supporting artists and cultural organisations through grants, bursaries, and resources, thereby promoting a vibrant arts scene for residents and visitors. He noted its role in celebrating and advancing Sligo’s cultural reputation in art, music, literature, and drama, both regionally and internationally. He added that a strong arts and culture sector also drives tourism and supports local businesses, as visitors spend on accommodation and hospitality. Festivals and events, he said, enhance Sligo’s image and boost the local economy. In this context, he welcomed the €20,000 increase for the Arts in the draft budget but stressed that further additional funding will be required in future years.

RESPONSES TO QUERIES

Ms. Concannon, Director of Services, addressed queries regarding town teams and representation. She clarified that, at present, there is one established town team in Tubbercurry. The local authority is at the initial stage of setting up teams in Ballymote, Ballisodare, Collooney, and Enniscrone, with the first open meetings scheduled to take place in the coming weeks.

She explained that the purpose of these teams is to provide a structured approach to town development and regeneration. Town plans will guide investment in community and public projects, with funding leveraged through schemes such as Town and Village Renewal and Rural Regeneration. These will support initiatives in community recreation, public realm improvements, and tackling vacancy and dereliction. She emphasised that this structured approach does not prevent organisations from applying for funding from other bodies, as they normally would.

Responding to Councillor Bree’s query on Housing Adaptation works, Mr. Flynn, Director of Services, confirmed that the estimated allocation of €703,000 for 2026 is based on the level of funding received in 2025.

On the Collooney–Bellaghy greenway, Ms. Concannon advised that Engineering Consultants are currently assessing the viability of a route parallel to the railway line. This assessment will determine whether such a route can be developed and is expected to be completed by the end of 2025. Councillor Bree welcomed this response.

Councillor Bree also sought clarification on the number of approvals under the Housing Loan Scheme. Ms. Whelan, Director of Finance, confirmed that the information would be provided directly to Members, noting that the figure would be relatively small.

QUERIES FROM COUNCILLORS O’BOYLE, HIGGINS AND E. MCSHARRY:

Councillor O’Boyle expressed his appreciation to the Executive for providing comprehensive budget details. Regarding the allocation of €75,000 for cemeteries, he queried whether this figure included revenue from the recent increase in burial charges imposed by the local authority, or if it represented a separate sum.

He further noted that €2.4 million was being written off in commercial rates and asked whether any legal avenues were available to recover that amount.

Councillor O’Boyle also sought clarification on the number of properties currently progressing through the Compulsory Purchase Order (C.P.O.) process, and whether any sites had been identified as suitable for modular housing, along with details of any assessments carried out.

Ms. Whelan and Mr. Flynn provided clarification on housing maintenance figures, reiterating the information already outlined earlier and in the budget documentation.

On the matter of cemeteries, Ms. Whelan explained that the €75,000 allocation derived from additional income generated through the Local Property Tax (LPT). Mr. Molloy, Director of Services, added that the increased revenue from cemetery charges had been ring-fenced for cemetery maintenance.

Ms. Concannon confirmed that several projects were advancing under modern design-and-build methods, typically involving timber or steel-framed housing. She noted that no sites had yet been designated for modular housing, with the local authority adhering closely to Departmental guidelines in this area.

It was further reported that a number of C.P.O.s are currently underway, alongside properties being acquired by agreement. Final figures will be provided directly to Members once confirmed.

Councillor Higgins noted that this was her first budget meeting and acknowledged the extensive documentation provided. She commended the team for their work in preparing the budget and highlighted the dedication and professionalism of all staff within Sligo County Council. She then offered several comments and posed one question.

On the motion seeking additional funding, Councillor Higgins suggested that restrictions on E.U. grant aid should be reviewed to allow local authorities greater borrowing capacity, enabling them to pursue more ambitious projects. Regarding the Local Property Tax (LPT), she felt there was scope to reframe the public discussion around it. By clearly demonstrating the benefits—such as showing that a local playground was funded through LPT—communities could better appreciate the value of local ownership, and she expressed a desire to see more of this approach in future.

She described the budget as ambitious, reflecting investment in local infrastructure while also addressing the everyday issues faced by Members. She cited examples of chronic under-investment in social housing, vacancies, dereliction, footpaths, and roads. The increased emphasis on tackling dereliction and vacancy rates was particularly welcomed, as was the commitment to modern construction methods, which she said would accelerate the delivery of urgently needed housing.

Councillor Higgins acknowledged the limits of the budget, as outlined by the Director of Finance, noting that not everything could be achieved within financial constraints. She referenced initiatives she had proposed—such as sports scholarships for athletes representing Ireland internationally, the provision of free period products in public buildings, a hop-on/hop-off tourist bus during peak season, and a canopy over Queen Maeve Square—all of which had received Council support. She remarked that, ironically, if more people paid dereliction and vacancy rates, such initiatives could be more readily funded.

As Chair of Cranmore Co-Op, she welcomed the planned development of the Cranmore Community Centre, which she said would serve the wider east Sligo community. She emphasised its importance as a much-needed piece of local infrastructure and looked forward to its delivery.

Finally, Councillor Higgins asked whether the allocation for homelessness included any portion of the €100 million announced by the Government for homelessness services.

Councillor E. McSharry began by extending her compliments to the Chief Executive, Directors of Services, and their respective teams. She remarked on the impressive range of projects underway, noting her strong support for initiatives such as the Harbour Masterplan, the Eastern Garavogue Bridge, and other developments. She commended the creativity of the teams in designing these projects, securing Government grant aid where viable, and emphasised that such schemes would attract enterprise, boost tourism, and enhance community life.

Councillor McSharry welcomed the increased focus on enforcing dereliction measures, expressing confidence that this would generate additional income while discouraging neglect across the county. She also endorsed the enhanced funding for cemeteries and public conveniences, as well as the highlighted initiative on lifeguard training. The emphasis on disability inclusion was particularly appreciated, especially the recruitment of a dedicated Disability Inclusion Officer.

Turning to housing, Councillor McSharry identified this as the central issue. While acknowledging Councillor O’Boyle’s point on the need to accelerate delivery, she stressed that quality housing must remain a priority. She stated that modern methods of construction offered the best route to achieving both speed and quality. She welcomed the assurance that 517 houses would be delivered, aligning with the increased demand under the new Housing Policy. The inclusion of affordable housing was also commended, though she emphasised that more units were needed for those excluded from both the social housing system and the current housing market due to high prices. She thanked the Director of Services for the responses provided on this matter.

Councillor McSharry sought clarification on the reference of “competitive dialogue” mentioned by Ms. Concannon, asking what this entailed in the present context.

Finally, she enquired whether the National Research Project with the A.T.U. was connected to disability initiatives and other projects involving the Public Participation Network (P.P.N.).

Councillor McSharry expressed surprise that only seven applications had been received under the Defective Block Scheme. She questioned whether more potential applicants existed and noted that the process appeared to be particularly onerous.

Confirming her support for the budget, Councillor McSharry stated that the financial bottom line was the key indicator for her. She commended the work undertaken, highlighting Ms. Whelan’s confirmation that savings of €6.2 million had been achieved. Nonetheless, she pointed out that a deficit of €9.3 million remained, acknowledging that this was a historic issue. While a Financial Plan had been provided by the Department and savings were being delivered by the Executive, she suggested that some level of forgiveness on the €9.3 million deficit would greatly assist the local authority in planning and investing in new initiatives.

Referring to Councillor Taylor’s comments on rural investment, Councillor McSharry agreed that further resources were needed in this area. In particular, she emphasised the importance of increased investment in rural roads and road safety, identifying these as two priorities she would like to see addressed.

LEAS-CATHAOIRLEACH

At 12.00 p.m. the Leas-Cathaoirleach took the Chair.

RESPONSES TO QUERIES

In response to Councillor Higgins’s query regarding the €100 million allocation, it was clarified that two separate matters were involved. The €100 million capital fund is designated for the acquisition of social housing to provide long-term solutions for emergency accommodation. By contrast, the figure referenced on page 8 of the budget book relates specifically to the ongoing operational costs of running emergency accommodation.

Addressing the question on “competitive dialogue,” Ms. Concannon explained that this refers to a procurement process particularly suited to mixed-tenure developments. Expressions of interest are invited from qualified tenderers—namely house builders—who propose schemes incorporating private, social, and potentially affordable housing. Applicants must meet minimum criteria before entering negotiations, with the objective of achieving the most effective scheme and best value for money.

QUERIES FROM COUNCILLORS HEALY, QUEENAN AND BRENNAN

Councillor Healy began by thanking the Chief Executive, Directors, and staff for their work in preparing the budget book and the efforts undertaken in advance of its completion. He emphasised that Councillors are ultimately there to serve the people.

Referring to the Chief Executive’s introduction, he noted that there had been no significant increase in funding over the past 13 years. Currently, 44% of the local authority’s income derives from grants, compared with just 21% in 2013.

Councillor Healy highlighted the need to raise with Government the agreement between Uisce Éireann and Sligo County Council to ensure that adequate funding is provided. He pointed out that the Council continues to bear the costs associated with operating public conveniences.

Welcoming the report on affordable housing, Councillor Healy recalled that he had previously tabled a motion on this matter. He stressed that housing provision should not be limited to social housing but must also include affordable housing, which he said was an obligation for Councillors to deliver in Sligo.

On the issue of low-cost accident schemes, he expressed concern that Sligo’s allocation of €370,000 was insufficient. With ten projects listed for 2026, he cautioned that it was unlikely all could be completed given the funding constraints.

Councillor Healy also referred to the N17 Knock to Collooney route, welcoming the fact that the project was progressing to Phase 3. He further acknowledged the work carried out to date on the N16.

Councillor Healy highlighted the need for funding for the Collooney to Castlebaldwin Active Travel Scheme, noting that the village of Collooney is effectively divided in two by the N4 route, with the Community Centre, crèches, and businesses located on one side. He added that the local campaign group has the backing of the N4 Action Group.

He queried the level of income generated from derelict and vacant sites and how much remains outstanding.

On public lighting, Councillor Healy observed that 9,500 LED lights have been installed, representing 87% completion, with 13% still to be delivered. He asked what level of savings had been achieved through this programme.

In relation to the Safe Routes to School initiative, he referred to Scoil Ursula and St. John’s and questioned whether rural schools were being included. He noted that he had previously applied for rural schools to be considered but was advised that there is a long waiting list, with many rural areas excluded.

Turning to the Active Travel Programme under N.T.A. grants, Councillor Healy stated that an allocation of approximately €3 million is expected. He asked whether this funding also covers the Pathfinder Project and if both fall under the same fund. If so, he expressed concern that the €3 million allocation may not be sufficient.

He welcomed the introduction of the Defective Blocks Programme and expressed his delight that it had been extended to Sligo, noting that Members had campaigned strongly for its inclusion. However, he was disappointed that only seven online applications had been received to date. As this concern had also been raised with him directly, he suggested that greater emphasis should be placed on person-to-person engagement to encourage more applications.

He further highlighted the allocation for land drainage maintenance, which stands at €38,250 for 2025 but is set to be reduced to €32,500 in 2026. He reminded Members that a Minister had recently met with them to discuss flooding concerns and cautioned that if sufficient investment is not made in this area, it would be difficult to approach the Minister to seek additional funding.

Councillor Queenan aligned himself with the remarks made by other Members, noting that this was the most important meeting of the year. He paid tribute to the Chief Executive, the Director of Finance, and all staff for their work, acknowledging that Sligo County Council had made significant progress and was now in a strong position. Despite the many challenges faced, he commended staff for their dedication and said it was uplifting to enter the Chamber and witness such positivity.

He observed that the key difficulty lay in deciding how funding should be allocated, with both Members and the Executive bringing their own priorities to the table. Looking ahead to 2026, he anticipated that issues such as housing, roads, road safety, speed, and planning would continue to dominate discussions.

Councillor Queenan highlighted the housing challenge in his own area and expressed confidence that the Chief Executive and Director of Services would be able to secure land around Enniscrone to deliver new homes for the local community.

Councillor Brennan thanked the Chief Executive and Directors of Services for their comprehensive report. He welcomed the allocation of €375,000 for cemeteries, along with the funding provided for housing adaptation grants.  Noting the high level of demand, Councillor Brennan asked when the grants scheme for older people would be reopened for applications in 2026, as he had received numerous enquiries on the matter.

He stressed the need for additional funding for the LIS and CIS road schemes, pointing out that, based on the applications already submitted, an allocation in the region of €5–€6 million would be required.

Councillor Brennan also raised concerns about public lighting in rural areas, citing Riverstown as an example where further provision was needed.

He welcomed the intention to take five estates in charge, while noting that some estates continue to face difficulties, particularly where water treatment plants are not operational. He referred specifically to an estate in Castlebaldwin that requires assistance.

In conclusion, Councillor Brennan confirmed his support for the budget, noting that this was the second budget during his term as a Councillor.

In response to Councillor Healy’s query regarding derelict and vacant sites, Ms. Concannon confirmed that the exact figures, including monies owed under the derelict sites levy, would be furnished to him shortly. She noted that all outstanding bills were being pursued and that invoices totalling €376,320 would be issued at the beginning of 2026 for all properties listed on the Derelict Sites Register.

Ms. Concannon further clarified that ten applications have now been received under the Defective Concrete Block Scheme, with nine of these deemed valid and forwarded to the Housing Agency. She highlighted that several community meetings had already taken place on the matter and that a dedicated staff member is available to provide assistance.

Councillor Healy acknowledged the meetings held across the county but stressed the importance of one-on-one engagement with affected individuals. He pointed out that many applicants are elderly and not online and emphasised the need for a physical office where they could seek support directly. Ms. Concannon reiterated that a staff member is already assigned to this role and that appointments can be arranged.

Mr. Molloy addressed queries relating to Active Travel. He explained that the main difficulty with the Safe Routes to School programme in rural areas is that existing schemes must be completed before new ones can commence. With a limited budget of €3 million, this presents a significant challenge. Following discussions with the Department, he confirmed that the allocation will not increase in 2026, and in fact, some larger local authorities will see reductions. He noted that maintaining Sligo’s budget required considerable effort. As Councillor Walsh had previously highlighted, once projects move on site, construction costs must also be covered within the same €3 million allocation. If too many schemes are advanced simultaneously, no further projects can be developed due to the finite nature of the budget.

Members were advised that Mr. Molloy would revert to them in relation to the savings on public lighting going to LED lights. 

In response to Councillor Brennan’s enquiry relating to the Housing grants, Mr. Flynn advised the meeting that priority one applications were currently being dealt with.  Until the allocation was advised for 2026, a decision could not be made around when to re-open those. 

Councillor Gallagher confirmed his support for the budget, describing it as very detailed. He acknowledged that Members had faced criticism for approving a 15% increase in the Local Property Tax but said it was gratifying to see the positive impact of that decision. He extended compliments to all Members who had supported the increase and commended the Chief Executive for being consistently approachable and available, as well as the Director of Services for their ongoing support throughout the year.

In addressing his second budget, Councillor Gallagher echoed the points made by Councillors Taylor and E. McSharry regarding challenges in rural areas, particularly in south Sligo. He congratulated Tubbercurry on its recent success in winning the Pride of Place award and highlighted the need for improvements to footpaths and roads in the town. He reiterated the call for additional funding for the CIS and LIS schemes.

He welcomed the allocation of funding for bus stops and cemeteries, including the provision of columbarium walls, noting that with land becoming increasingly scarce, such measures would help address the issue. While recognising the importance of Active Travel initiatives, he pointed out that the necessary infrastructure to support cycling and walking to school was still lacking.

In conclusion, Councillor Gallagher reflected on the progress made by Sligo County Council. Having listened to colleagues with longer service recall the difficulties of the past, he praised the Chief Executive and Director of Finance for their work in turning the organisation around and placing it on a stronger footing.

VOTING ON RESOLUTIONS:

The Leas Cathaoirleach then informed the meeting that he would take resolutions in the order they had been received.

Proposed by Councillor D. Bree
Seconded by Councillor G. O’Boyle

AND AGREED

“Noting the legacy of underinvestment in Sligo and the Northern and Western Region, this Council calls on the government to provide an additional financial allocation to this and the other Councils in the region to assist us in maintaining and improving services and in addressing the many challenges we face as a ‘lagging region’.”

ADOPTION OF BUDGET FOR FINANCIAL YEAR ENDING 31^ST DECEMBER 2026:

Proposed by Cllr. T. Walsh
Seconded by Cllr. T. MacSharry

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council hereby adopts the Budget of Sligo County Council for the year ending 31^st December 2026, and subject to the provisions of Section 103 of the Local Government Act, 2001, as amended, as submitted by the Chief Executive Officer set out in Tables A, B & C of the said Budget.”

The Cathaoirleach then asked the Meetings Administrator to call the roll for a vote which resulted as follows:

FOR:    Councillors Bree, Brennan, Casserly, Clarke, Gallagher, Higgins, MacSharry, T., McSharry, E., Mullaney, Mulvey, Nealon, Queenan, Taylor and Walsh (14)

AGAINST:       Councillors Gibbons, Healy and O’Boyle (3)

ABSENT:         Councillor Gilroy (1)

The Cathaoirleach deemed the resolution CARRIED.

RATEABLE VALUATION MULTIPLIER:

Proposed by Cllr. T. Walsh
Seconded by Cllr. M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“Subject to Section 6 of the Local Government Rates and Other Matters Act, 2019 as amended, and in accordance with the Budget adopted, determine the annual rate on valuation applicable in the calculation of the amount of the rate under Section 4 of the Local Government Rates and Other Matters Act 2019, as amended, to be €.2536.”

ABATEMENT OF RATES:

Proposed by Cllr. T. Walsh
Seconded by Cllr. M. Clarke

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council adopts the Commercial Rates Abatement Scheme 2026 in respect of rates due to it by liable persons, or classes of liable persons, in respect of vacant properties in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 of the Local Government Rates and Other Matters Act 2019.  Such a scheme will provide a tiered abatement of rates on vacant premises as provided in Section 9 (1) of the Local Government Rates and Other Matters Act of 2019 for the financial year ending 31^st of December 2026 as set out in table below:

Annual Rates Bill	% Payment Due	% Abatement of annual rates
< €3,000	50%	50%
€3,001-€19,999	60%	40%
> €20,000	75%	25%

CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2026-2028

Proposed by Cllr. T. Walsh
Seconded by Cllr. G. Mullaney

AND AGREED

“To consider the Capital Programme 2026-2028 in accordance with Section 135(2) of the Local Government Act, 2001, as amended by the Local Government Reform Act, 2014 (pages 106-109 of the Budget Book).”

CONTINUATION OF THE RATES INCENTIVE SCHEME FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 31^ST OF DECEMBER 2026:

Proposed by Cllr. T. Walsh
Seconded by Cllr. T. MacSharry

AND AGREED

“That Sligo County Council continue the operation of the 2023 Rates Incentive Scheme for the financial year 31^st of December 2026 in accordance with Section 66 of the Local Government Act, 2001, as amended by Section 43 of the Local Government Reform Act, 2014.”

ALLOWANCE FOR CATHAOIRLEACH:

Proposed by Cllr. T. Walsh
Seconded by Cllr. J. Queenan

AND AGREED

“That the allowance for the Cathaoirleach be fixed at €20,000 per annum with effect from the 1^stJanuary, 2025.  This allowance is to be paid monthly in arrears to cover reasonable expenses incurred by the Cathaoirleach within County Sligo.”

ALLOWANCE FOR LEAS CATHAOIRLEACH:

Proposed by Cllr. M. Casserly
Seconded by Cllr. J. Queenan

AND AGREED

“That the allowance for the Leas Cathaoirleach be fixed at €4,000 per annum with effect from the 1^stJanuary, 2026.  This allowance is to be paid monthly in arrears to cover reasonable expenses incurred by the Leas Cathaoirleach within County Sligo.”

ALLOWANCE FOR MAYOR OF SLIGO BOROUGH MUNICIPAL DISTRICT:

Proposed by Cllr. D. Bree
Seconded by Cllr. A. Gibbons

AND AGREED

“That the allowance for the Mayor of the Sligo Borough Municipal District be fixed at €12,000 per annum with effect from the 1^stJanuary, 2026.  This allowance is to be paid monthly in arrears to cover reasonable expenses incurred by the Mayor within the Municipal District.”

ALLOWANCE FOR CATHAOIRLEACH OF BALLYMOTE-TUBBERCURRY M.D.; SLIGO DRUMCLIFF M.D. AND CHAIRPERSON OF EACH STRATEGIC POLICY COMMITTEE:

Proposed by Cllr. M. Clarke
Seconded by Cllr. J. Queenan

AND AGREED

“That the allowance for the Cathaoirleach of the Tubbercurry-Ballymote Municipal District and the Sligo-Drumcliffe Municipal District and the Chairperson of each Strategic Policy Committee be fixed at €6,000 per annum with effect from the 1^stJanuary, 2026.  This allowance is to be paid monthly in arrears to cover reasonable expenses incurred.”

END OF MEETING:

The Leas-Cathaoirleach thanked all the Members and the Executive, in particular the Chief Executive, Mr. Lydon, and the Director of Finance, Ms. Whelan, for their work on the budget.  Thanks were also extended to Ms. Branley, Meetings Administrator, for her assistance.

The business of the meeting concluded at 12.30 p.m.

Meeting Date 17/11/2025